Supreme Court pushes memogate case to November 12

Supreme Court issues notices for November 12 hearing instead of the previously announced date of November 5.


Azam Khan October 23, 2012

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan will resume hearing of the infamous memogate scandal from November 12.

Earlier, the apex court had affixed hearings for October 22. However, due to the unavailability of the bench the date was pushed forward to November 5.

On Tuesday, however, the SC issued notices to all parties for a November 12 hearing instead of the previously announced date.

A nine-member larger bench led by Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry will hear the controversial memo case in light of the memo commission’s findings.

Former Pakistan ambassador to US Hussain Haqqani was implicated in the scandal where he allegedly had a memo delivered to Admiral Mike Mullen through Mansoor Ijaz. The memo had offered greater government cooperation in return for US backing against the powerful military in the immediate aftermath of the May 2 raid.

A commission was formed with three high court judges at the helm to further probe the matter and ascertain the facts. The commission in its report did not find President Asif Ali Zardari to be involved.

The commission  however was challenged and Asma Jehangir, counsel for former ambassador Haqqani, had filed a review application. Haqqani, through another counsel had also raised serious objections to the working and line adopted in the report.

COMMENTS (5)

AJ | 11 years ago | Reply

Interesting turn of event as part of asghar petition the SC has asked the government to take action against the former army generals and initiate the investigations against the other conspirators and on the other hand it has reinstated the Memo case which is perceived to be a case to trap the current government....interesting....is it coincident or a move to ?......?

Mirza | 11 years ago | Reply

If HH is found guilty of sending an unsigned and undated memo indirectly to the US general would the CJ and SC refer the punishment to the govt, just like they did against the generals and rightwing party leaders a couple of days ago? Even though the crimes of generals and their rightwing touts were certainly treason and involved hundreds of millions of public funds but there was no punishment even after 16 long years of the case. One shady man based charges against HH do not border stealing the elections and robbing the people of democracy. Let us see how fair and honest these judges are.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ