No political cell currently active, Presidency tells SC

CJ observes by supporting a party, the president had violated the oath.


Web Desk October 17, 2012

ISLAMABAD: In a reply submitted in the Asghar Khan case on Wednesday, the Presidency stated that there is no political cell operating currently in the President House, Express News reported.

The rejoinder was submitted by the President Asif Ali Zardari’s Secretary Asif Hayat.

Heading a three-member judicial bench, Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry said that by supporting the Islamic Jahmoori Ittehad (IJI), the president had gone against the presidential oath, according to which a president cannot discriminate between political parties or groups.

The chief justice observed that Aslam Beg, as an Army chief, should have restrained himself from intervening in political matters.

Justice Khilji Arif Hussain said that distribution of funds in billions of rupees was Beg and former ISI chief Assad Durrani’s individual act and that the entire Army cannot be blamed for it.

Upon being questioned, the registrar informed the Supreme Court that the former director-general of Military Intelligence (MI) has received summons and had assured that he will attend tomorrow’s hearing.

COMMENTS (4)

Beatle | 11 years ago | Reply

Tomorrow's Headlines: "CJ rejects presidency reply."

Jibran | 11 years ago | Reply

Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry said that by supporting the Islamic Jahmoori Ittehad (IJI), the president [GIK] had gone against the presidential oath.

The chief justice observed that Aslam Beg, as an Army chief, should have restrained himself from intervening in political matters.

Justice Khilji Arif Hussain said that distribution of funds in billions of rupees was Beg and former ISI chief Assad Durrani’s individual act and that the entire Army cannot be blamed for it.

Can you give a verdict instead of making speeches? Any action on who took the bribes?

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ