Blacklisting Haqqanis 'not good': Pakistani official

Senior Pakistani security official says the move will negatively impact future Pakistan-US relations.


Afp September 07, 2012

ISLAMABAD: Any decision by the United States to blacklist the Haqqani network as terrorists will negatively impact future relations with Pakistan, a senior Pakistani security official said Friday.

The Pakistan-based network has been blamed for some of the worst attacks in the last 10 years' of war in Afghanistan, such as a June assault on a lakeside hotel that killed 18 people and a 2011 siege on the US embassy in Kabul.

"Frankly speaking, any decision by the US to declare the Haqqani network a terror group will not be a good sign for future Pakistan-US relations," the official told AFP, speaking under anonymity because he was not authorised to talk to the media.

"The saner elements within the US administration do understand the complications that may arise in bilateral ties after they declare the Haqqani network a terror group," he said.

The New York Times has reported that the Obama administration has decided to blacklist the Haqqanis and is expected to announce the decision as early as Friday.

A senior State Department official travelling with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in Brunei said she had made a decision and expected to submit it to Congress on Friday.

US officials have debated the move for a month, fearing that it could worsen the alliance with Pakistan after more than a year of turmoil in the delicate relationship.

The Pakistani official concurred that would likely be the case.

"Any such decision will take the relationship back to square one, ruining the improvement seen in ties between the two countries during the last couple of months," he said.

The official said that the US commander in Afghanistan, General John Allen, was expected in Islamabad soon to address "this and other irritants" in relations.

Washington has long demanded that Pakistan take action against the Haqqanis and last year the outgoing top US military officer, Admiral Mike Mullen, accused the network of acting like the "veritable arm" of Pakistani intelligence.

Pakistani officials have in the past admitted to contact with the Haqqanis as a hedge for influence when US troops leave Afghanistan, but deny supporting their operations and downplay the group's importance.

The security official denied that Pakistan had refused to launch an offensive against militants in the tribal district of North Waziristan, where the Haqqani leaders have been based.

"What we say is that we will launch an operation in the area with the full support and backing of our government and people, and at the time of our choosing," he said.

COMMENTS (46)

butt jee | 9 years ago | Reply

@Tick Tock: Please read my response to "Sindhi Topi" and Jihad Bil- Qalam. Pakistan does not want to keep its Western borders destabilized. In fact my point of view is that US and NATO has fought against Taliban for almost 11 years but they have not been able to achieve the desired results. Now there is a need to seek peace on the negotiations table. Unfortunately be declaring Haqqanis a terrorist outfit, the option of negotiations will no longer be available to US. Hence the region, particularly our Western border will remain destabilized.

Tick Tock | 9 years ago | Reply

@butt jee:

I find so very interesting how Pakistan thinks keeping its border destabilized with extremism serves its interests. As if there will never be repercussions to planting the seeds of militant nationalism in a country divided along sectarian lines. It's one thing to wish continued war upon your so called Afghan neighbors for 32 years and running. It's another to think war empowers you. There is no country on earth that thinks perpetual war empowers it except Pakistan. And the sad reality is, Pakistan is wrong. I would be concerned about Obama's reaction to Pakistan in his second term. He may just decide Bush had it right by threatening military force.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read