Since that speech, there have been conflicting statements and reports — from Washington and Islamabad — on the scope of the planned operation against militants, specifically in North Waziristan. A joint operation has been ruled out by Pakistan and in any case America will not want to get entangled in another area. A coordinated operation and what it would entail has not been explained by either America or Pakistan. Yet, the operation is imminent now. Additional troops have been moved to the area. The army is claiming that a final decision will be taken by the government and if not withdrawn, governor Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa’s order of 2009 should still be effective and can be used to start the operation.
If a targeted operation means going after specific targets, it will require excellent intelligence, which is lacking at the moment. The Pakistan army also does not have the luxury of drones, gunships and the use of the air force could result in extensive collateral damage. This means that for raids on specific targets, ground troops will have to be deployed. Use of ground forces will result in fighting in the built-up area, which is dreaded by armies due to heavy losses suffered by troops in such situations. Due to limited night-flying capabilities, night raids as carried out in Afghanistan are also not possible. Furthermore, villagers fear the Taliban, so they will not provide help and intelligence to the military. A targeted operation will be a slow and prolonged campaign and will not bring about a quick solution.
A possible option could to be to emulate the strategy employed in Swat and South Waziristan, of vacating the whole area and treating any person found after a deadline as enemy. Swat was a success primarily because of factors not relevant in the North Waziristan case. Both Swat and South Waziristan (the Mehsud area) had no access to Afghanistan. Historically, Swat was a peaceful area and militancy was not in the blood of the Swatis. Falling unknowingly into trap of the Taliban, they were quick to vacate the area, became IDPs and within three months went back to their homes. The IDPs of South Waziristan are still reluctant to go back and remain in camps in Dera Ismail Khan and Tank. Though much smaller than South Waziristan, North Waziristan cannot be vacated. With porous borders, militants will prefer crossing the border. And that is where a coordinated effort will be needed. But ISAF’s ability to deploy sufficient troops on the Afghan side of the border is in doubt.
Yet another option is to keep the operation localised. Instead of a major offensive, the agency can be cleared piecemeal. For example, a possible area can be from Bannu till Mir Ali, securing the Mir Ali-Thal road and including the right bank of the Tochi River. However, chances are that militants will not let it remain a localised operation and will try and spread it. Lacking the capability to fight pitched battles, their decentralised command system gives them the advantage of being able to take the initiative and employ hit-and-run tactics.
Whatever option is adopted, it is going to be a prolonged operation and various factors will affect the outcome. Even if it is to target the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), the reaction of Hafiz Gul Bahadur and Maulvi Nazir of South Waziristan will play an important role. They are most likely to jump into the conflict. Also, a question remains as to why the US is interested in an operation against only the TTP. At the very least, the American perception that the situation in Afghanistan is bad because of North Waziristan will be proved wrong.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 24th, 2012.
COMMENTS (18)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Author:
"Also, a question remains as to why the US is interested in an operation against only the TTP. At the very least, the American perception that the situation in Afghanistan is bad because of North Waziristan will be proved wrong."
I don't know what's difficult in un-fathoming US interests in operation against TTP. Just ask yourself who TTP is fighting against? US or Pakistan? If you know that you know the reasons of US interests. It would be an endless war as long as US would like to by providing fuel to both the parties. If we have any serious intentions to win this war, we will have to seal the Af-Pak border by ourselves before launching the offensive. And if that is not possible, we should better find some other solution instead of going to war.
Khalid Munir... what ever the options are with the govt... only "Garib Ka bach" will suffer.. Politicians and even the Generals will be sitting tight in their Air-conditioned offices.. we will sacrifice the young officers & jawans.
@Zoon: I have quoted a proverb in the West which came out of a couple of people/incidents. I agree with you. If I have to re-write it I would say "war is too critical a policy to be left to the professional killers". Regards, Mirza
There are three main aspects to fighting a war (1) intelligence (2) logistics (3) execution. 1. The author is taking a very dim view of the military assets. While intelligence on the ground is not possible, Pak military has several assets to monitor the insurgents unless they fly carrier pigeons to communicate. Also, the demographics of the voluntary evacuees can give an idea of the location and strength of insurgents. 2. If this war is fought as a war and not as a policing action, logistics should not be a problem for Pakistan, a narrow country with nearby cantonments and an airforce equipped with a variety of military transport planes, mobility should not be an issue. Night vision equipment is not new to Pakistan military, they have been toying with this kind of stuff since the 80's, and so have they with precision and guided munition that is essential for reducing collatoral damage. 3. Depends largely on the strategy, do we really want to purge the insurgents or we just want to buy time from NATO. That will define tactics and the outcome. BTW, none of this is confidential (a lot of it is common sense though), pick up any of the Jane's world wide defence series and you will be able to read much more about Pak military capabilities.
The real threat to pak is from S waziristan so question arises from here that why should pak army are not launching operation in S waziristan.it means that we are fighting for $ at behest of US.furthermore,there is negotiated agrement between Gulbahadar and pak army,remaining is Haqani network(the army cant and do not take action against it).the collateral damage of innocend tribles will happen only.**
War is NOT important at all @Mirza:
We have very experienced and 5Th biggest army in the world. I am not a army man but it is simple. fighting gorilla war is very difficult. best option is to bomb them TTP and their supporters without any mercy. Than occupy the area after the final kill. Please do not show any mercy to TTP and its supporter please do the job till it is finished. This is war of survival for the people of Pakistan. Please give them final warning to surrender and lay down their arms.
@Mirza: "War is too important to be left to the generals. This universal truth is still applicable to all countries including Pakistan".
Yes you are right. Zardari, who is yet to visit Tribal Areas, should get out of his fortified bunker and lead 'war on terror'.
well borders should be sealed on both sides as so far in most operations the millitants flee that area and once the area is cleared the army should create local tribal peace force which should be supported by all means not by killing them . sincerity is the only way to eliminate terrorism or else US wud again cry that pak is nt serious in eliminating terrorists. all should be treated as terrorists nd there shouldnt be good and bad talibans as they have killed thousands of pakhtoons both side of border
Swat was a public relations stunt -- months of press conferences discussing the operation - no effort to cut off retreat of the enemy - didn't kill any important bad guys - and you sent a big bill to the USA.
if they choose operation in north wazirstan.they needed a strong planning and excellent support of intelligence,if they get local support it quite helpful to windup the operation as soon as possible.
So, the solution, do nothing? TTP is a irritant to US in Afghanistan but a threat to PAK. It is in PAK interest to go after them now when US is providing logistics and support. PAK should remember the wave of assassinations and the suicide bombs as reasons to go after them. Even if that is not enough, as the author suggests, proving Americans that they are wrong about TTP is a good enough reason!
This is all very wishful thinking ! Face the facts and reality, which suggests that Pakistan Army simply will not act in that region. There are two different possibilities, firstly that they simply lack ability to fight these type of warfare and are ill trained & equipped for it, or that they simply are not willing to take on these elements as they still class them as their Assets for future. Perhaps in Afghanistan, after US withdrawel and also may utilise them in Indian Kashmir, as they are unlikely to make any progress on that front too !
Talk, talk, talk but no movement, not of forces nor of supplies. Therefore no offensive any time soon - and with the coming of winter we will once again hear excuses.
War is too important to be left to the generals. This universal truth is still applicable to all countries including Pakistan.
PLEASE, how is Pakistan EVER going to have the writ of the state exist in the FATA region without the ARMY COMING TO THE REGION AND PERMANENTLY STAYING THERE! Enough of this whining about POSSIBLE negative effects! Pakistan cannot complain about "sovereignty" with regard to drone strikes when it cannot go to the same target area and arrest those militants!
"Whatever option is adopted, it is going to be a prolonged operation". What if coordinated operation on both sides of the border, ensuring no space for militants/taliban to breath?