Federation says Ashraf cannot write Swiss letter, SC rejects reply

Federal govt says court orders given to the prime minister should be withdrawn, SC says orders not revokable.

Web Desk July 24, 2012

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court, while hearing the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) implementation case, rejected Prime Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf’s reply submitted to the court today, saying that a plea for review of the court’s order should have been filed instead, Express News reported on Tuesday.

The court said that the objections raised mentioned those orders that the court issued to the prime minister on June 26 and July 12, but neither were the copies of these orders attached with the plea submitted nor are these orders revokable.

The court also said that if the federation wished to get these orders repealed, then it should have, as per the rules and regulations of the Supreme Court, filed a plea for reviewing them.

Earlier, in its reply submitted to the Supreme Court, the federation stated on Tuesday that Prime Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf cannot write a letter to Swiss authorities.

Ashraf had been given a deadline to explain his position regarding writing a letter to Swiss authorities to re-open graft cases against President Asif Ali Zardari.

The federal government further said that the court orders given to the prime minister could not be followed and that they should be withdrawn.

The Supreme Court in its last hearing had observed that if Ashraf fails to comply with the court’s orders then proceedings according to law and the Constitution will be leveled against him.

Former prime minister Yousaf Raza Gilani has already been held in contempt and subsequently disqualified by the Supreme Court of Pakistan for not complying with its orders.

Express News correspondent Faisal Shakeel reported that the Supreme Court has consumed one of the six options it had given in the NRO implementation case by holding Gilani in contempt, which is why it will deliberate on the remaining five options.

The options were: disqualification, contempt proceedings, commission implements NRO, claim immunity, action against NAB chief, leave it to the people.

In the reply, the federation also stated that the federal cabinet has not yet given any suggestions to Ashraf on whether or not a letter should be written, therefore, he is not ready for taking any decision at the moment.

Facebook Conversations

COMMENTS (69)

Iqra | 7 years ago | Reply | Recommend

I have two questions for the ongoing imbroglio? Q1: While many liberals are bashing SC and its zealot Judges for their supposed judicial-overreach and most of the conservatives are dreaming of the day when the court ousts the President of the Islamic Republic for shepherding an (allegedly) corrupt government, what side (SC or Gov.) do you think have the potential to do more lasting-damage to the prospects of a prosperous future of this beleaguered country? A government that is setting examples of defying courts or a court that is becoming an executive? Q2: What do you think is the role of lawyers to tame down the judiciary now? Should there be another lawyer’s movement now to tell the SC that if lawyers can stand against a military dictator, they can also stand against a judicial dictator?

The Asker | 7 years ago | Reply | Recommend

@Dr.A.K.Tewari: Amen

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Load Next Story