Senate passes contempt of court bill

PML-N walks out from Senate proceedings in protest.


Web Desk July 11, 2012

ISLAMABAD: The Senate on Wednesday passed the contempt of court amendment bill on Wednesday amid protests by the opposition parties, reported Express News.

The opposition protested for around two hours during the proceedings and stated that the bill was being passed by ‘bulldozing’ basic Senate procedures. The Pakistan Muslim League–Nawaz (PML-N) also boycotted the proceedings in protest.

The bill was pushed through the National Assembly on Monday but still needs to be signed by the president to become law – which will probably be done before July 12, when the court takes up the Swiss letter matter.

The NRO case, ordering the government to write letter to Swiss authorities to reopen graft cases against President Ali Zardari, has already cost the ruling Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) one prime minister. Yousaf Raza Gilani was disqualified by the Supreme Court for committing contempt of court by not writing the letter.

The bill will ostensibly provide cover for Prime Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf from possible disqualification by the Supreme Court.

During the debate on the bill Senator Aitzaz Ahsan said the government should review the draft of the Contempt of Court Bill as law made in haste could be harmful for the government.

He said the proposed law is giving immunity to the president and the PM but we must not forget that the situation will change when the party will be in sitting in the opposition.

The bill has already been challenged in the Supreme Court for being contradictory to the Constitution.

Earlier taking part in the general debate on the Bill, Leader of the Opposition Ishaq Dar said it is a malafide attempt and amounts to lowering the prestige of the Parliament.

He demanded that it should be withdrawn otherwise the opposition will take appropriate action to ensure that the bill doesn't stay on the statute book even if it becomes an act.

 

COMMENTS (23)

Sunder Khan Afridi | 11 years ago | Reply

@elementary: Well said

Sultan Ahmed | 11 years ago | Reply

Parliament is lawmaking institution/authority, It can amend the constitution and frame new laws. It is a powerful institution and supreme in nature.

Supreme court, under the constitution have authority to consider the law if find repugnant to any basic law or constitutional article can give its opinion.

The fact is that gulf between two powerful institution of the state has been widened looks can not be bridged.

What would be outcomes of the existing situation? When I see around as a citizen of the country,think and look at the sky,find thunderous black clouds coming to my homeland,God save us all from the rainy days,because He is alone can provide us complete safety from all the crisis expected in the near future.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ