It was in September 1977, that X served in the martial law complaint cell at Peshawar. Some of the cases that came for redress concerned the mindless nationalisation of private businesses executed under Mr Bhutto’s reforms. One such case for denationalisation was for a Nowshera-based rice husking mill. At some point during the processing of the case, the owner, a hunchbacked gentleman, somehow got the notion that X was using delaying tactics.
One day, the owner entered X’s office, came around the desk, opened a drawer and slipped in a small packet. The packet contained Rs30,000, the oil to get the works going. X was tempted: here was his chance of going on the much wished for European tour, which he could not otherwise undertake on his captain’s salary. Nor, indeed, could his father finance such an undertaking, having gone bankrupt only a few years earlier. But the thought that made this foolish man return the packet was: how will I justify the expense?
Shortly afterwards, he left the army and went to work for a multinational firm in Karachi. Now, as luck would have it, a very close friend from the army was posted at the National Logistic Cell in the city. Within weeks of the pair meeting up, it was known to X that the friend was making a goodly sum of money in graft for berthing ships out of turn at Kemari — the going rate at that time being Rs40,000 per ship. Not that X was very bright and sensed the insalubrious carrying on. Nothing of the sort; only the friend made no bones about it.
Now, this was a time when the new Honda Civic hatchback had just hit the market in Pakistan. The friend fancied the car which, it has to be admitted, was a pretty thing at Rs80,000. He, therefore, suggested that X sell his old banger (purchased with a loan from the company he worked for) and that the friend will get him a new Civic. No generosity there, only a very devious slant.
The car was to be registered in the friend’s name but maintained by X. The friend would borrow it whenever he needed to gallivant off with his girlfriend, for he feared the chance of his wife spotting him in his own car. Despite the temptation of driving a brand new machine, X refused.
This was a time when X’s father was doing some work in Karachi, frequently visiting from upcountry and borrowing X’s car to go around the city. X was worried that since his father knew he had purchased the car with money lent by his employer, there was no way he could justify a brand new auto that cost more than twice as much as the company gave out for car loans.
The devious friend plied X with several untruths that he could trot out to fool his father but X was adamant. It would be known not just to his father but also to his colleagues that he was indulging in something unholy to be able to purchase an expensive new car. Since he could not justify the ownership of the new Civic, he was not taking it.
X continued to drive his jalopy while the friend moved from car to car. But in order to not raise questions, he was very careful to always purchase slightly used models. Still, it was clear that the man was living beyond his major’s salary. His father, who also lived and worked in Karachi, apparently never questioned his son about the source of his income. Surely, the old man would simply never have suspected any wrongdoing on his son’s part.
Now, we have a certain Dr Arsalan Iftikhar who has risen from a Grade-18 government job to become the owner, by his own admission, of a business empire worth Rs900 million. One wonders if the thought of justification for his meteoric rise ever came to his mind. Or, if the family ever brought up the subject.
Banish the thought.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 7th, 2012.
COMMENTS (15)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
let me be clear. i totally support what the writer has written. justificiation is akin to accountability. i don't support what dasmir and mirza have cited as examples. they add up to denying accountability.
@freudianslip: Of course a person who has actually committed the crimes is responsible. However, nobody is a born killer; it is the family and society that nurtures the person. Why were there no suicide bombers before the madarsas in Pakistan? Taliban have understood this fact and they are capitalizing it to their max advantage. The culture of Pakistan (and some other societies) is such that people making modest salary live large and their extended family and friends never question that, in fact they approve of it and are proud of his/her achievements. In addition there is a constant pressure on the simple and stupid people like me who only depend upon their small salary. I have seen my acquaintances who were teaching in colleges left a higher grade job and accepted lower grade jobs in commissioner’s office, customs and Income tax in most cases to please their families and improve their “standard of living”. I would not come home after giving up my job as professor after taking an inspector's job in police, customs or Income Tax.
I find the logic of holding the parents responsilbe for actions of an independent ,sane ,adult individual ,quite bizarre.He may have cashed in on his Father's status but that does not prove father guilty.
@MK Well said @freudianslip That is how a sane mind thinks. If you are pre programmed or presumptuous then you write the sort of stuff the writer has dished out here and which has been supported by Mirza, Waseem and Dasmir et al.
What if the subject did come up... and it turned out to be perfectly justifiable. Maybe someone should try and find out whether its justifiable or not instead of writing articles about it...
@mirza and @dasmir - did it occur to the dacoit that he had become an adult, fully capable of taking conscious decisions ? if we keep blaming our mothers and grandmothers for the way we are then our children will justify their actions by blaming their mothers and on and on and on.
@Solomon2: Yes the message is clear and universal. Indiscriminate killing of anyone is one too many and should be condemned. Mixing terrorism with religion does not sterilize the killings and does not make them kosher. Regards, Mirza
One wonders if the thought of justification for his meteoric rise ever came to his mind. Or, if the family ever brought up the subject.
Is Arsalan Iftikhar a member of the PPP?
If not, why should he be under any kind of scrutiny?
The 'LAW' or the 'self righteous' version of it applies only to the PPP.
dear sir, something different this time?
So Called Chief Justice of Pakistan should read this and learn some wisdom!
"Members of this Court are vested with the authority to interpret the law; we possess neither the expertise nor the prerogative to make policy judgments. Those decisions are entrusted to our Nation’s elected leaders, who can be thrown out of office if the people disagree with them. It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices."
by Chief Justice of United States
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2166417/Chief-Justice-Roberts-strikes-forced-broccoli--approves-Obamacare-mandate.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
"If only she would have stopped me then and there -"
@Mirza: it happens to nations, too. What if the U.N. had stopped the Arabs from killing Jews for fun and profit after WWII? The Arabs would never have substituted terror-worship for religion, would they?
The "Chalata hai" culture has pervaded everyone. Here is story my Mother used to tell me when I was a child and I tell to my children and I think should be given as must read in the school curriculum. A man was to be executed/hanged for crime of dacoity and he was asked his last wish before execution.He wished to see his mother a last time.When he mother was brought to see him he grabbed his mother and bit her nose off.Screaming that woman was taken away from condemned cell and police put chain around the condemned man,The magistrate was completely at loss for the prisoner's bizarre behavior.He called the prisoner and asked him why he bit his mother's nose off? The prisoner replied that when I as a child he used to steal and bring small things,a rubber,a pencil, a copy, a mango,a bread,his mother never scolded or hit him and forbade him from stealing.As a result he thought nothing wrong in stealing! And now he is going to be executed that could easily have been prevented by his mother that she didn't do.That is why as revenge he bit her nose off! If "Arsalans"of today start biting noses off of their parents,half of Pakistan and India will have "Naak katas"
very nice. Thank you sir. Missed your articles for a couple weeks.....
Dear author, you have hit the point home in a simple and honest way without a lot of rhetoric. My mother who never was allowed to go to school used to tell me a story about a famous dacoit. When he was finally arrested and was sentenced to death, they asked him for his last wish. The dacoit asked to see his old grandmother before the death. When his grandmother came face to face the dacoit quickly strangled her to death. When asked about why he did that to his old and frail grandmother, he told them the following: When I was a little boy I stole an egg that a neighbor’s chicken just laid and brought home. My grandmother never interrogated me about the act as a result I turned into an infamous dacoit! If only she would have stopped me then and there I would not be hanged! This is not just the dilemma of Arsalan’s home but of most of the homes in Pakistan. Even today, I feel guilty when I buy a luxury item or high priced car and discuss it with my whole family prior to that even though I am independent of them.
Funny, you question, like millions & millions others, Arsalan Iftikhar Chaudhry the not so bright son of our sitting Chief Justice and who does not want to admit that he did not wish to see what was going on rather than making this claim of not knowing what was going on. This makes us suspect that this not so bright son did not have so bright father either, only problem is that this man sits on the highest chair in that supreme of all institutions in our country. Is that our national back luck or only this not so bright family's back luck.