At a time when tensions with the United States are soaring and senior American leaders, including Secretary of Defence Leon Panetta, are spewing venom in order to ratchet up pressure on Islamabad, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) is increasingly gaining importance as it provides a forum for networking within the region on some pressing issues common to all. With the addition of Turkey as a dialogue partner and the acceptance of Afghanistan as having observer status, the organisation seems to be knitting regional countries ever closer for a multitude of reasons. Both Russia and China share almost identical views on the Iranian nuclear programme. Also, Pakistan thinks more or less in the same vein about the questionable Western opposition to the Iranian quest for nuclear technology. Finally, the Iran-US tiff continues to inject tension and serves as a debilitating factor in regional geopolitics. And since Russia, Iran, China and Pakistan have a much greater stake in regional peace and stability, there is all the more reason for them to develop a synergy of thought on Afghanistan, too.
The four countries cannot look at Afghanistan as an endgame for the US-Nato alliance; they have to coexist with Afghanistan forever and should worry about it keeping their own interests in mind. None of these countries — Tajikistan and Turkmenistan, Russia, China, Iran and Pakistan — can afford a permanently unstable Afghanistan, prone to extremist forces and held hostage to drug cartels.
All the SCO nations are equally wary of the drugs that originate in Afghanistan and the threats that its organised, transborder crime pose to neighbouring nations. Unsure of the US-led Nato alliance’s response to the narcotics trade and the organised crime by strong warlords — some of whom are active partners of the Western alliance in the questionable war against terrorism — most SCO countries do want to close ranks in order to devise regional responses to militancy, drugs and organised crime. This process is likely to receive further impetus if Russian President Vladimir Putin follows up on his promise to visit Pakistan in September/October this year. It will be a big stride, not only for the bilateral relationship, but also for Pakistan’s quest to wipe off the shadows that the Cold War era cast over its relations with Moscow. President Putin is also expected to attend the Islamabad round of the quadrilateral summit involving Afghanistan, Pakistan, Russia and Tajikistan.
Additionally, India’s growing partnership with Washington appears to have slowed down New Delhi’s quest for the SCO membership. That is, perhaps, underscored by the fact that even in Beijing, instead of the prime minister or the president, the minister for external affairs represented his country. This means that they will be consequences for Pakistan because both India and Pakistan will be added to the group simultaneously — probably at the next summit in Kyrgystan a year from now. The engagement with its core members, China and Russia, however, represents huge realignment opportunities for Pakistan to shift its focus away from the thorny relationship with the US to Moscow, Beijing and, of course, India for a smoother political and commercial partnership within the region. The SCO is no alternative to the US-led Nato but it promises huge dividends in terms of regional commercial linkages and economic cooperation.
Also, now that Washington has clearly de-hyphenated India from Pakistan (meaning that it favours India over Pakistan), officials in Islamabad believe the American tilt towards India offers a good opportunity for Pakistan to seek greater alignment with China and Russia. The Chinese, by turning Zardari’s visit into a bilateral one, displayed their displeasure over what President Obama did to the former in Chicago. It is now, perhaps, Moscow’s turn to show appreciation for and empathy towards Pakistan. Also, if Iran, China, Russia and Pakistan can forge unity for economic cooperation, this can create an unmatchable momentum of its own in the region.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 20th, 2012.
COMMENTS (14)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
with regards
RAJENDRA SAHIB@Rajendra Kalkhande:
I want to attract ur attention towards narrowism which indian media is presenting against muslims and islam. indial is trying to hit twice in one kick. one one side india is trying to create good relations with muslim states and on the other side, israel is your best business partner. you must remember that u can change ur friends but not neighbours. for god sake , stop propaganda against pakistan. we(india and pakistan) can conquer world only if we make efforts together. so think twice and then propagate
??????pakistan??????SCO
@ram iyer: Your points are well taken. However, I don't think India is actually ready (beyond bilateral trade agreements within the region and possibly creating a stronger identity for SAARC) to assume any role of such responsibility. China is a good example; it has worked under the radar during the period from 1978 - 2000 to build its energy security and trade relationships and is now gradually asserting itself. We must not be in a hurry to make a grand entrance - if we get our basics right, everything else will fall in place.
I can see what Pakistan can get out of closer alignment with Russia. But what would be the benefit to Russia to alienate US for Pakistan's sake? (It may disagree for its onw national interests but do not see why it would do so for Pakistan).
You may think that China is a higher than Himalayas friend. But it wil also not pick a fight with the US for Pakistan. The maximum you can expect is that some negative UN security council resolutions maybe vetoed by China.
By the way where Afghanistan is concerned, China Iran and Russia's interests are not different from US and NATO interests. No-one wants Afghanistan to once again become a hub for terror export the way it was during the Taliban reign in 1996-2001.
@ram iyer: You hit the nail when you said - "If India get its house in order(key socio-infrastructural parameters) by better productivity/utilization/accountability, it can generate an additional gdp by 3% straight. If India calls its extended neighbours direct and tell them the real benefit of working together and put a action plan to implement (even done 50%), it brings value. "
This has been India's failing. If India's socio-economic standards were high, its economy and soft power would be very high consequently leading to high influence in the neighborhood. Like America, if only, India could help Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan etc to guide and help them materially and with expertise, other countries could learn from watching. Pakistan is a problem because of its inherent dysfunctional nature because nobody seems to care about critical aspects of its nation building.
What is that Pakistan has brought to the table? It is always milking one superpower or any other power for pak's own benefits to play its games against India and "hate hindu" policies and now "hate amreeka" policies. I would tend to agree with "You said it" that Pak is trying to play off 4 powers rather than do anything constructive in Afganistan
ha ha ha...The author may be day dreaming to count on the support of Russia in order to counter India. The Red Army hasn't forgotten the death of 30,000 troops in Afghanistan. Regarding China, the importance of Pakistan is to contain India. But we are working towards countering that ideology of Chinese. Russia will support Pakistan against US and nothing more than that.
I generally note authors from India/Pakistan need some broader thinking with all due respect. Somehow they confine themselves to a level that is 1/10 of what Britian punches today and particularly India. India totally lacks backbone and the writing is of various authors is mere reflection of that.
A nation of 1 billion people never take a cue from some other nation.
It is so simple but so difficult without a proper Kshatriya blood (for word sake). India needs middleeast in particular Iran in many ways. India needs the near neighbourhood issue free and also from economic sense. India is physically next to China and Russia.
Someone Indian thinkers of today's breed seek still a white-man driven story that they somehow convert and sell. You have to ape someone who is similar to you and you have to see your fundmentals. It goes to the enlightment concept. Gets yourselves in order everyone respect you. Believe you, all believe you. If India get its house in order(key socio-infrastructural parameters) by better productivity/utilization/accountability, it can generate an additional gdp by 3% straight. If India calls its extended neighbours direct and tell them the real benefit of working together and put a action plan to implement (even done 50%), it brings value. Tell neighbours with blaring words (use media like americans and british use for state purpose) that we are there with you.
India need to step-up..
To think that Russia and China will embrace Pakistan and turn a blind eye to its doctrine of using Afghanistan as a hotbed of Islamic militancy is a pipe dream. While we Pakistanis since Jinnah have deluded ourselves about our supposed "strategic location" (whatever such gibberish means), Pakistan doesn't add much value in commercial or strategic terms to either Russia or China. Both Russia & China have vastly higher commercial/strategic interests in India, that they will not sideline. Remember that their joint bi-directional trade with India exceeds our GDP.
As such, Pakistan can only serve as a pawn in their great game against the US. And we must remember that pawns are fundamentally designed for sacrifice. I can clearly see that if our establishment pursues this delusional dream of trying to play off 4 elephants (US, China, Russia and India) against each other, they should prepare to get trampled.
Gul Sahab, few points need correction. 1. India is very keen to join SCO as full member and one can find many links to that effect. Indian FM's statement in Beijing is on record for anyone to see. 2. Except one SCO meeting in Russia, Indian PM has never attended any other meeting. Reason is of protocol. India not being a full member, finds it inappropriate to send the Prime Minister to attend these meetings. SCO meeting in Russia was a different case as Russia is too close an Indian friend. 3. India has much more strategic interests in Afghanistan than Russia. India is far more closer to Afghanistan physically as well as culturally than Russia. If Pakistan thinks that Russia and China have interest in Afghan peace, India too has much larger interests and can not be ignored.Russians know is very well. In fact even Pakistan knows it, but tend to underplay for known reasons. Its high time for Pakistan to realize that she is the only trouble maker in the region and no one else. Putin's visit is not going to help much unless Pakistan changes her policies on terrorism. After all Chinese and American presidents have been visiting Pakistan regularly. Has that helped Pakistan much lately ?
The sad part of the story is that in any forum, grouping, alliance, event, Pakistan seeks to define itself vis-a-vis India; the sadder part of the story is that no one else sees Pakistan that way - not today. India is interested in being part of the SCO - there is a security angle to the group but also a strong energy security paradigm that India is hungry to be a part of. Unlike Pakistan, India's relations with the US and relations with Russia/ China are not a zero-sum game - its continued strong relations with Russia (and even Iran in the face of direct pressure from the US) are testament to that. Further, if Pakistan believes (and this seems to be the constant refrain) that US intends to cut its losses and run from Afghanistan, then all problems related to Afghan security/ instability/ drugs flow are linked directly to Pakistan - and all of the SCO states will see Pakistan as part of the problem and not the solution.
Without delinking from Afghan Taliban, we will go nowhere. China and Russia have threats from extremists based in FATA and Taliban dominated Afghanistan. Fergana valley of Central Asia is extremist hotbed having militants linked with Taliban. SCO’s major objective is counter terrorism and anti-extremism. China, Russia and Central Asian states support Northern Alliance against Taliban. So how would SCO counter NATO-US? NATO, US and SCO have similar objectives in Afghanistan when it comes to extremism.