Our interests in Afghanistan

Our narrow interest in having more influence than India in Afghanistan should not trump greater interests of the world

Editorial June 08, 2012

While we are fighting the Pakistani Taliban and sacrificing a tremendous amount of blood in doing so, we are, at the very least, ignoring the Haqqani Network, which primarily carries out attacks in Afghanistan. After years of diplomatic inquiries and suggestions that we may want to consider the Haqqani Network a threat as well, the US finally reacted harshly in the form of a speech given by Defence Secretary Leon Panetta in Kabul. Panetta said that the US is “reaching the limits of our patience” with Pakistan and urged it to deny the Haqqani Network a safe haven in North Waziristan.

For the US, stymieing the Haqqani Network is vital to its plans for withdrawing from Afghanistan by 2014. The only way the US can leave the country without having to admit defeat is if violence in Afghanistan is significantly reduced. Pakistan, however, sees things differently. By keeping the Haqqani Network operational, it thinks it can both counteract Indian influence in Afghanistan and get a seat in the post-US Afghan government that it expects to be dominated by the Taliban. We need to realise how unwise this plan is. It is essentially a rerun of our Afghan policy of the 1980s and 1990s, when the same flawed logic brought us lots of guns, drugs and refugees but little security while destroying the nation of Afghanistan.

Pakistan certainly has a case when it tells the US that it does not have enough troops at its disposal to fight the Haqqani Network in what would surely be a long and bloody battle in North Waziristan. But the problem is that the military is perceived by many, especially the rest of the world, as being hand-in-glove with the Haqqani Network, through its intelligence agencies. The thinking is that this is done as part of the — very flawed and now discredited — policy of ‘strategic depth’. The end result is that we are not only making it harder for peace to take hold in Afghanistan, we are also harming our own interests because the rest of the world does not believe us when we say we are innocent of any interference. Our narrow interest in having more influence than India in Afghanistan should not trump the greater interests of the world.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 9th, 2012.


Afghanistan | 9 years ago | Reply @Maria: lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ahmad shah Abdali born in Multan............Thats why I advise you to study the history. Anyway for your kind information Abdali was from kandahar and he conquered India and Multan was part of India at that time. Yes you are right that we should solve our problem by ourselves but you pakistanis can not fight indians by yourself so want us to be friend with you against India. Leave us alone and try to strengthen your country not only militarily but economically so that could fight with india. Better to slove your disputes with India and dont drag us for that enmity.
Maria | 9 years ago | Reply

@Afghanistan: The fact that so many Indians and Afghanis are here to chant their delusional mantras about stability in Afghanistan and using Pakistan as the scapegoat for all their problems shows me how truly devious they are. It is clear that both Indians and their Afghani puppets share an unhealthy Pakistan obsession - right down to a confused sense of history. Whether you want to understand this or not, modern India is a creation of the British that came to be in 1947. Prior to that the Muslims of South Asia ruled all of the region. As for Ahmad Shah Abdalli, he was born in Multan in present day Pakistan. You can go on denying that facts or history listening to the tune of your Indian piper but remember a Persian saying "cheghel ba alk-i khonera mega, sorakhe ! " This sums up the dilema of Afghanis not taking responsibility for their own affairs and blaming others. Look in the mirror and you will see the truth staring back at you.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read