Another suspension

Matters of dual nationality should be investigated by the Election Commission, and not the Supreme Court.


Editorial June 05, 2012

After Farahnaz Ispahani’s National Assembly membership was suspended by the Supreme Court for holding dual nationality, it was inevitable that others would face the same punishment. Such has been the case for Interior Minister Rehman Malik, whose membership in the Senate has been suspended, although he will continue as the de facto interior minister by being appointed as an adviser to the prime minister. The Supreme Court suspensions may seem to be overly harsh but there can be no arguing the fact that dual nationals have been barred by law from serving in parliament. In the case of Ms Ispahani, she commendably and honestly admitted in court that she holds American citizenship, while Malik has denied holding a British passport although he was unable to satisfy the Court that he was telling the truth.

It is disturbing that both the parliamentarians, who have had their membership suspended — so far — are from the PPP. However, here have been whispers about others holding dual nationality in the opposition parties, too, and it is time that the Supreme Court investigated this so that the impression that it is singling out a particular party is dispelled. Besides, rather than pursuing such cases, where the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is questioned, it may be wiser for the justices to try and clear up the thousands of cases that are gathering dust.

Ultimately, though, matters such as these should be investigated by the Election Commission (EC), and not the Supreme Court. It is the EC which should find out if any parliamentarian lied on the papers they filed and then decide on the appropriate punishment as defined by the Constitution. With general elections approaching, a stronger, more independent EC would help solve not only the dual nationality issue but also inspire confidence in the electorate at a time when its independence is greatly needed. The two cases, both, involving the PPP MPs, suggests an ominous turn again towards a confrontation between the judiciary and the PPP-led executive. One sign of this is the re-designation of Rehman Malik as adviser following his suspension. This confrontation must be avoided.

Published In The Express Tribune, June 6th, 2012.

COMMENTS (12)

Huma | 11 years ago | Reply

The topic of the piece should have been ‘rich’ Pakistanis who hold dual nationalities cannot be loyal to either country’ because that is the strata you focused on. There was nothing constructive or enlightening about this piece other than repetition of what every Pakistani already knows; non residents have a superficial interest in the country and they are arm chair critics and dual nationals living in Pakistan will bail once the going gets tough.I have a question – how do you define loyalty or patriotism? Most Pakistanis will jump at the opportunity to live aboard or acquire another passport. Just because they can’t and have to suffer through hyper-inflation, power outages, security threats etc and are ‘stuck’ living in Pakistan does not mean they are loyal. Your article does not convince me at all.

Imran | 11 years ago | Reply

Good editorial. Once again our CJ is usurping the powers of the Legislative branch of the Govt, the Speaker. This CJ has been giving improper and unconstitutional judgments during the last two years, causing serious damage to our democracy and freedom , stability and resultantly the economy. Its about time he should be asked or forced to resign. Otherwise his continuing in office will be disastrous for the country.. He is on a journey of personal vendetta and is overly ambitious, power hungry and has low legal acumen.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ