Kashmir separatists reject Indian PM's autonomy offer

"Our struggle is not for restoration of autonomy." said Mirwaiz Umar Farooq.


Afp August 11, 2010
Kashmir separatists reject Indian PM's autonomy offer

SRINAGAR: Separatist leaders in Indian Kashmir dismissed Wednesday overtures from Prime Minister Manmohan Singh about political autonomy in the region following months of anti-India unrest.

Appealing to Kashmiri Muslims to "give peace a chance", Singh had said Tuesday that his government would consider any consensus proposal for autonomy as long as it remained "within the ambit" of the constitution.

He also announced the creation of a panel of experts that would draw up a "jobs plan" for Indian Kashmir where rampant unemployment -- especially among young people -- has fuelled resentment against Indian rule.

But senior Kashmir separatists rejected Singh's initiative. "Our fight is for independence, not autonomy," Javed Mir, a former militant commander turned separatist politician, told AFP. "We will continue our fight for our goal through peaceful protests," said Mir, who had been among the first Kashmiris to take up arms in 1989 when frustration against Indian rule boiled over into a full-blown insurgency.

Under the terms of its accession to India in 1947 -- after independence from Britain and the sub-continent's division -- Kashmir was granted a relatively high degree of autonomy, excluding areas like defence and foreign affairs. But those powers have been eroded over the years, and renewed promises of greater autonomy gain little traction in separatist circles.

"Our struggle is not for restoration of autonomy. It is to seek our right to self-determination," Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, an influential moderate separatist and Muslim cleric, told AFP. "We should be allowed to decide whether we want to remain with India, accede to Pakistan or carve out an independent state," he said.

The Kashmir legislative assembly in 2000 passed a resolution favouring full restoration of the state's autonomy, but it was rejected by the then Hindu-nationalist government in New Delhi. Autonomy is the main demand of the ruling National Conference, the state's biggest pro-India political party.

COMMENTS (7)

Daubic | 14 years ago | Reply Mr. Anon, I really appreciate your views but one thing you need to understand. The lame excuse of minorities looks sick to me. There are also minorities in Pakistan and hope you know how they were treated and how they live. Here are the examples, Christians, Sikhs, Hindus etc... who were killed giving lame excuses by your strategic assets in the name of religion. Sikhs were asked to pay Millions of Pakistan money as protection tax and their property were looted. Mark my words, the situation is not going to change till there is going to be some changes in your current system.
Anon | 14 years ago | Reply @Daubic...by saying "I am a Muslim from India and we are far better and happy than the Muslims in a Muslim country like Pakistan" you are basically making an unrealistic contrast and ignoring the situations that are currently shaping the political landscape. What is the point of comparing Indian Muslims with Pakistanis? There is an understandable distinction. In India, Muslims themselves are a minority. This fact itself is the main reason why there are hardly any sectarian issues among Muslims (if any at all). The civil wars and political scenarios that Pakistanis face is different from what an Indian Muslim could face - because there is a difference of environment.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ