The political economy of peace

Cooperation has become a matter of survival, given the threat to life support systems of region’s integrated ecology.

Dr Akmal Hussain April 15, 2012

This may be a watershed moment in the post independence history of Pakistan and India. Four features define this moment which if grasped can help build a better future for their peoples: (a) Pakistan is in the process of establishing democracy as India is trying to deepen it; (b) a broad consensus has emerged amongst mainstream political parties and rational elements in civil society in both countries, that peace is a necessary condition for the democratic endeavour as well as for development; (c) a seismic shift is taking place in the centre of gravity of the global economy for the first time in three centuries from the West to the region in which India and Pakistan are located. If these two countries can cooperate, they can help create in their region the greatest economic powerhouse in human history: an economically integrated South Asia could become the second largest economy in the world after China over the next three decades; (d) amidst this great economic opportunity has emerged the grave threat of climate change, which could undermine the ecological life support systems of South Asia, unless mitigation and adaptation measures are urgently undertaken within a framework of cooperation. Let us briefly outline the political economy of this moment.

The recent historic decisions taken by the Pakistan government towards free trade with India in consonance with the earlier South Asian Free Trade Area agreement are: granting in principle, MFN status to India; converting the earlier positive list which restricted trade to a few specified items, into a negative list which allows trade in all items except those in the negative list, together with a commitment to reduce even this negative list to a minimum by the end of this year; collaboration to reduce non tariff barriers by both sides within a specified time frame. These major decisions reflect a change in the balance of power in favour of elected civil authority within the informal power structure that underlies the formal institutional structure of democracy in Pakistan and shapes the governmental decision-making process. Democratic functioning has also drawn strength from the passage of the Eighteenth, Nineteenth and Twentieth Constitutional Amendments, an independent judiciary and a parliament united in its effort to protect democracy. The overthrow of an elected government by a military adventurer has become much more difficult.

Sustaining democracy in both Pakistan and India requires giving a stake in citizenship to all of the people rather than only a few, in terms of participating in the growth process, as well as governance. This requires institutional changes within the two countries to make both economic and political processes inclusive. Such inclusiveness in the institutional structures of the economy and polity would sustain and give meaning to the process of economic growth. Vital to such an undertaking is the establishment of intrastate peace. However, combating militant extremism which threatens this peace requires interstate peace and cooperation.

Cooperation has now become a matter of survival, given the threat to the life support systems of the region’s integrated ecology. The latest evidence suggests that three kinds of stresses on the economies and societies are likely to occur as a result of climate change over the next three decades: firstly, water stress. The minimum per-person water requirement per year is 1,700 cubic meters. As against this the water availability for Pakistan being 1,329 cubic meters per person per year is already at the water stress level; India is expected to reach water stress levels by 2025, with water availability reaching 1,140 cubic metres per person per year. Secondly, rising average temperatures are expected to result in a 30 per cent decline in yields per acre of food grains in South Asia in the next four decades according to a UN Report. Thirdly, rising sea levels will cause salinisation of low elevation coastal agriculture  zones resulting in loss of livelihoods and displacement of over 125 million people in South Asia. Thus, adaptation and mitigation measures through regional cooperation are necessary not only to sustain growth but to survive.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 16th, 2012.

Facebook Conversations

COMMENTS (15)

Shah | 8 years ago | Reply | Recommend

The author has articulated stance with hardcore date which make is argument very convincing.

gp65 | 8 years ago | Reply | Recommend

Author says"Sustaining democracy in both Pakistan and India requires giving a stake in citizenship to all of the people rather than only a few, in terms of participating in the growth process, as well as governance. This requires institutional changes within the two countries to make both economic and political processes inclusive. Such inclusiveness in the institutional structures of the economy and polity would sustain and give meaning to the process of economic growth. Vital to such an undertaking is the establishment of intrastate peace."

This implies that to sustan democracy in India, there needs to be peace between India and Pakistan. Not true. Despite multiple wars initiated by Pakistan, India has managed to sustain its democracy. Would it help if India could believe Pakistan's peaceful intentions and get a peace divident absolutely. But democracy in India will sustain regardless of Pakistan's behavior.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Load Next Story