Showcasing power: ‘Islam Zindabad Conference’

An estimated 1.5 million people, including people from 2,500 seminaries, will be participating in the conference.


Our Correspondent February 27, 2012

PESHAWAR:


Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) announced an ‘Islam Zindabad Conference’ scheduled to be held on March 23 in Peshawar.


JUI-F’s Provincial leader Sheikh Amanullah and former federal minister Maulana Ataur Rehman said the ‘Islam Zindabad Conference’ will be a major blow to other political parties and termed it ‘the last nail in the coffins of other political parties’ since an estimated 1.5 million people, including people from 2,500 seminaries, will be participating in the conference.

They claimed that more than 10,000 motorcyclists will reach Peshawar from the southern districts of Dera Ismail Khan, Tank and Lakki Marwat, adding that orders had been placed for 20,000 flags. The JUI-F leaders also blamed the Awami National Party (ANP) for rigging the by-election held on Saturday for NA-9 in Mardan. They said that the result of the polls was already decided since ANP is part of the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa coalition government. They also demanded the Election Commission of Pakistan to take notice of the extensive aerial firing by ANP activists.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 27th, 2012.

COMMENTS (3)

Engr Miraj uet | 9 years ago | Reply

V r proud of mulana sahib.. Yaw awaz yw quwat jamiat jamiat

Liberalache | 9 years ago | Reply

@Aftab Khan:

Doesn't make sense to prevent politicians from using the word "Islam"....how would such a restriction even work? What we should do is have some sort of system of transparency aside from our media (which is concentrated in a few hands), our courts (which have historically been part of the problem), or any of our other failed institutions. Some P2P way of exposing all the people of influence in our country and show them for what they are. That way, if someone is misusing the words "Islam", "liberal", "democracy", "secular", etc, they should be exposed for the frauds that they are. Greater transparency, not restriction, is the solution.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read