Justice delayed and denied: No apex court for AJK litigants

Supreme Court is ‘non-existent’ under the state’s constitution as it has a chief justice but no permanent judges.


Ah Nizami December 06, 2011
Justice delayed and denied: No apex court for AJK litigants

MIRPUR:


Owing to a number of vacancies in the Supreme Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, the court is yet to be constituted as prescribed under the state’s constitution.


Under sub-section 3 of section 42 of AJK’s Interim Constitution Act 1974, the state SC comprises a chief justice and two judges. But while the court currently has a chief justice, no permanent judges have been appointed to the apex court. Only one ad hoc judge is part of the court right now.

Thereby, in the constitution’s language, the court does not exist.

Current AJK Chief Justice Muhammad Azam Khan took office on June 25. He was the only permanent judge when former CJ Khawaja Shahaad Ahmed retired on May 15.

The incompletion of the court has led to problems for the AJK High Court. Two HC judges, Muhammad Younis Tahir and Rafiullah Sultani, had challenged in the SC the high court’s decision to terminate their services. The SC had ordered that no judge should be appointed in the AJK HC, against the positions of Tahir and Sultani until the SC decides on their appeals.

What further complicates the issue is that according to the AJK state’s constitution, an ad hoc judge cannot be appointed as permanent judge. However, the AJK CJ is only allowed to appoint an ad hoc judge when all permanent judges are hearing one or more cases.

“Failure to appoint permanent judges against vacant positions has resulted in a loss of confidence and trust of the people in the AJK judicial system,” said former AJK CJ Abdul Majeed Mallick. “Litigants travel from distant areas to appear before the top court but their cases are adjourned without any progress.”

Kamran Tariq, President of the Mirpur District Bar Association, agreed that this inordinate delay in the court’s completion was disillusioning people. “Dispensation of speedy and inexpensive justice from the apex court seems unlikely because of its present incomplete structure,” he said, calling the government’s attention towards the gravity of the situation.

Seasoned Mirpur-based lawyer Ramzan Dutt said that the prolonged wait for justice for the needy is also making justice more expensive.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 6th, 2011.

COMMENTS (3)

Mehwish | 12 years ago | Reply I am a student of journalism. I was under impression that 'photostat journalism' (using other's copy) existed only in regional Urdu language newspapers some of which are referred to as Daak Editions as they are rarely monitored by the editorial offices in Islamabad and resultantly the capacity of AJK journalists is plummeting to new depths. However, some English newspapers are not exception and yours being one of them. I have read an identical story in The Nation. Though I can understand yours has been refined at the desk, yet the quotes are exactly the same in both stories.. Please discourage this trend as yours is a trend setter newspaper. Ask your reporter who has copied whom on this issue.
Tanveer Ahmed (@sahaafi) | 12 years ago | Reply

Better still. Why doesn't PK give up on AJK, vacate the territory and let us (AJK Citizens) get on with setting up a Constituent Assembly?

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ