Pakistan has been painted in the deepest, darkest shades of black imaginable by Afghan President Hamid Karzai who, along with every single Afghan one happens to meet on their own soil, vilifies Pakistan for all the ills of Afghanistan, both real and imaginary. The most common term of abuse for Pakistan in Kabul right now is a variation of the country’s name which equates it with a term of abuse. The inflammatory term is used by many Afghans (I was recently in Kabul on a visit) and reflects growing hatred and resentment against Pakistan, in sharp contrast to the past when many would see it as a valuable trading partner and friend. It seems that support — real or perceived — of the Afghan Taliban and the Haqqani network changed all that.
As for Hamid Karzai and his American overlords, both are fighting to retain a vestige of international credibility. In the case of Karzai, this is something he has never really enjoyed in Afghanistan. In the case of the Americans, they are quite clearly eager to absolve themselves of the ‘war against terror’ that they so conveniently created in a region where they desire a permanent foothold. They are now fast throwing caution to the wind in their dealings with Pakistan and the looming possibility of outright invasion of our tribal regions at least, could, if all else fails, become a reality. If that happens, Pakistan’s sovereignty could be compromised.
Tribal elders, visiting Kabul from their ancestral lands along the Durand Line, claim that Pakistan has encroached into Afghanistan by anywhere from 10-40 kilometres, and although such claims are hard to independently verify, they are believed by a lot of Afghans. This adds further to the resentment and anger against Pakistan, with many simply saying that they should march across the border and ‘set things right’. Of course, all this is not good for Pakistan, or even for Afghanistan, because the region needs peace and stability and that will happen only when there is greater realisation on all sides of the cost of war.
America has loudly declared, on more than one occasion, that it will not launch a ‘boots on the ground’ attack in Pakistan’s border regions but that doesn’t mean that the aerial route has been ruled out. Of course, one hopes that that does not happen, and that good sense prevails on both sides of the Durand Line. Both Afghanistan and Pakistan need to understand that a stable neighbour is good for them and that the best approach is to have direct engagement with one another.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 20th, 2011.
COMMENTS (15)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@andleeb: He is expressing his concern for his fellow muslim bros.
@Afghan: You will Afghanistan degenerate again into its usual state of anarchy because no amount of foreign aid and help can help the Afghani people because of the way they are! The best Pakistan can do is close the border to these Indian puppets and let them continue to fight with each other. All Pakistanis should work to deny Afghani citizens any jobs, homes or opportunity in Pakistan. Just ship them all back to Kabul where they belong.
@fahim: You are from India... why do you say "we"?
I agree with @Amjad lets just put a fence, i don't get it why are Americans against it. They don't want people crossing right. Just put a fence, look at what India has done it borders with Pakistan. It seems as if Americans want Pakistan to be involved, they want to be able to blame someone.
Has anyone heard of a concept called PEACE ?
All the more reason why Pakistan should support all legal parties, including Haqqanis and Taliban, in Afghanistan, as india is trying to install its own proxies there.
i don't agree with those who say that pakistan is hated by afghans but the fact is that aghanistan is divided in two parts southern and northen afghanistan.southern afghanistan which comprises majority of afghans has always remain pro pakistan and they hate india and still they haven't changed their attitude,they still love pakistan but they have been labelled as taliban and brutaly suppressed by US and nato forces.iam sure whenever they get rid of occupying forces,they will express their pro pakistan sentiments.
@Afghan: Since when do the Baluch and Pashtun want to join Afghanistan and a Tajik led state there? You forget that are more Pashtun in Pakistan than in Afghanistan and that most Pakistani Pashtun have no interest in joining a state with Tajiks, Uzbeks and Hazaras. Afghanistan is the state that needs to be balkanized into separate states for the different ethnic groups there. None of my family has interest in Afghanistan. As for Baluch, they have no love for Afghanistan at all, even the minority of nationalists. Perhaps you should say all the land up to the Amu Darya should be ruled by Pakistan. As for Afghanistan, it has historically been pro India from the time the British gave the Indians independence. This is no surprise to Pakistanis and we should accept that Afghanistan will always remain some form of lackey of the Indians. With this reality we should work to gain maximum benefit and work to seal the border. I am sure that these people will be trying to get back to Pakistan when the West leaves. We have been far too hospitable in giving them shelter and sanctuary. The next time we should not be so generous. It's time to put up a fence and let the Afghanis deal with their Indian masters alone.
Yes, india and America are fully responsible for us wanting to control Kabul. We are now free to justify our export of strategic assets to India, USA and Afghanistan. The world is against us.
Seriously - you think India gives $2 billion in aid to Afghanistan so it can do business with Afghanistan? Can anyone do business in Afghanistan given the state of its economy? Most sane folks think that is not even a possibility in the foreseeable future. India passed up on the gas from Iran because the IPI pipeline would pass through Pak - is there anything that Af has to offer that is more valuable?
Also, if the US wanted to invade Pak they would have done so long ago. The Americans are far smarter than Pakistanis like to give them credit for. If the US wanted to so eagerly withdraw, they've had and continue to have plenty of opportunities. And, it won't take much to find a scape goat for Afghanistan - there is a self made target sitting right next door. Pakistanis can deny this all they want, but this time the US and India are in Af for the long haul. Pak can choose confrontation or it can choose cooperation. The world is prepared to deal with both.
The writer is missing the point! West of the River Indus is Afghan Land. We Pashtun & Baluch are Afghans. The sooner this Terror state is bulkanized the better it would be for world peace!!
You can fool some of the people all the time and all of the people some time but not all of the people all the time. Today Pakistan alongside the US is the most hated country in Afghanistan not India, a fact most citizens have not been able to accept so far. Afghans accept that through History India was a good neighbour and positive influence and the marauders mostly came from the West. They also had tremendous respect for pre independent freedom fighters like Gandhi and Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan who used the ideology of secular non violence to achieve independence. Any amount of Religious indoctrination has not been able to shake their brotherly affection for their erstwhile neighbour. It is natural that when the Afghans are going through turmoil they want and expect help from those they consider friends. Why Pakistan does not fall in that category is something the people of Pakistan must ponder about and take urgent steps to address it. It does not really matter who rules Kabul once the goodwill of the people is ensured. By denying free transit of people, goods and services between India and Afghanistan, Pakistan is acting like a jilted lover, an action not designed to win any goodwill or match pompous words like FRIENDSHIP.
We must stop thinking like a hegemonic considering Afghan as 5th province and concepts of "strategic depth" should be put to rest once for all. We must respect sovereign decision of afghans to befriend US or India, and only then expect respect in return. We must concentrate to develop ourselves rather try in futile to match the superpowers like US , China and India and reallocate national resources for the good of citizens. We can never match India in conventional war, it has progressed far ahead. Their defense budget itself is much bigger than our entire national budget. And we cannot use N too, as there will be nothing left after that. What is peanuts of expense for India is a huge expense for us, and getting involved in such race is only harming us. The quicker we learn to live according to our size, capability and position, it is better for all of us.
"Of course, India should realise that it can do business with Afghanistan mostly through the land route". Does India seriously want to do business with Afghanistan? It needs Afghanistan only to keep Pakistan off balance. For that no direct road link is needed. India probably wants to fence off its border with Pakistan and let Pakistan stew in its own juice.
"Of course, India should realise that it can do business with Afghanistan mostly through the land route". Does India seriously want to do business with Afghanistan that a road link matters. How much can it trade with Afghanistan? Afghanistan is a security issue for India & the best way to keep Pakistan off balance. For that it doesn't need a roadlink to Afghanistan. In fact a roadlink to Afghanistan could become a nightmare for India. Its best that pakistan deals with afghanistan. India just needs to erect a wall on its border with pakistan.