TODAY’S PAPER | July 04, 2026 | EPAPER

Jamaat-ul-Ahrar's reported third split from TTP raises over internal divisions questions

Reported split raises questions over whether it reflects routine restructuring or deeper divisions within the TTP


Shahabullah Yousafzai July 04, 2026 2 min read
A photo of a TTP member. PHOTO: FILE

PESHAWAR:

Jamaat-ul-Ahrar (JuA), widely regarded as one of the most influential and lethal factions within the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) — second only to the Hafiz Gul Bahadur group — has reportedly announced its third split from the organisation.

The group has maintained a significant presence across Pakistan's Malakand Division, Mohmand, Bajaur, Peshawar, and surrounding districts, while also developing networks in major urban centres such as Karachi and Lahore.

The reported separation has prompted questions over whether it reflects a routine organisational reshuffle or bigger strategic and ideological differences within the TTP.

Historical background

Jamaat-ul-Ahrar first emerged in 2014 after formally breaking away from the TTP. The faction was led by Omar Khalid Khorasani, one of the organisation's most influential commanders, while Ehsanullah Ehsan served as its prominent spokesman.

The split was primarily driven by opposition to the appointment of Mullah Fazlullah — a non-tribal figure from Swat — as TTP chief. JuA leaders argued that the decision had been made without adequate consultation with senior commanders and that their faction had been excluded from the leadership process.

Following nearly a year of mediation by local Taliban leaders and the Afghan Taliban, the two sides reached a reconciliation. Sources have previously stated that Sirajuddin Haqqani, now Afghanistan's Interior Minister, played a key role in facilitating those efforts. Jamaat-ul-Ahrar subsequently rejoined the TTP in 2015.

Read More: TTP hideouts hit in fresh precision strikes

Relations between the factions, however, remained strained. JuA commanders reportedly criticised Mullah Fazlullah's leadership for lacking strategic clarity, despite the fact that both groups adhered to the same school of thought.

They also disagreed over operational policy, with JuA and the Hafiz Gul Bahadur group often claiming responsibility for attacks that the TTP leadership chose not to acknowledge publicly, describing its silence as a "strategic" approach.

By 2017–18, the two sides were reportedly operating separately, despite the absence of a formal public announcement. Following Fazlullah's death, TTP leader Mufti Noor Wali Mehsud succeeded in bringing JuA back into the organisation, where it remained until the latest reported split.

According to reports, the current separation is linked to disagreements over TTP policies and concerns regarding the organisation's alleged growing proximity to hardline factions. These claims, however, have not been independently verified.

Operational reach and strategy

Security observers say the reported split suggests that Jamaat-ul-Ahrar seeks to pursue a broader operational strategy, viewing the whole of Pakistan as its area of operations rather than limiting its activities to the former tribal districts or Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

Recent attacks claimed by the group, including one in Karachi, have been cited by analysts as evidence of this wider geographical focus.

Some analysts also believe JuA's more proactive operational posture could help it attract new recruits. However, these assessments remain analytical judgments rather than independently established facts.

If confirmed, the reported split would represent another significant development within the evolving militant landscape in Pakistan and could have implications for the cohesion and future trajectory of the TTP.

JuA is also believed to have established connections with Balochistan separatist groups, and analysts suggest it may claim responsibility for attacks in Balochistan province in the near future.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ