Nearly 1,000 sign open letter over AI clauses in children’s TV contracts amid Peppa Pig backlash

The letter calls to reconsider contractual language that could allow children’s voices to be reused for AI training

Photo: Five

A growing wave of concern is building across the entertainment industry after nearly 1,000 actors, parents and creatives signed an open letter criticising AI-related clauses in child voice actor contracts linked to the Peppa Pig franchise.

The letter calls on studios and rights holders to reconsider contractual language that could allow recordings of children’s voices to be reused for artificial intelligence training or synthetic voice generation. Critics argue that such clauses raise ethical questions about consent, long-term control, and the commercial use of performances recorded during childhood.

The debate centres on growing industry use of AI tools that can replicate or modify human voices, particularly in long-running children’s programmes where young actors are regularly replaced as they age. Opponents of the clauses say children are especially vulnerable, as they may not fully understand how their voice data could be stored or reused in future projects.

The controversy has largely focused on entertainment giant Hasbro, which owns the Peppa Pig intellectual property following its acquisition of Entertainment One. The preschool series remains one of the most globally recognised children’s brands, airing in more than 180 countries.

Hasbro has recently expanded its experimentation with AI tools across its portfolio, including initiatives involving iconic characters and voice technology partnerships. The company has previously stated that it is exploring ways to use AI to support storytelling and content development while maintaining safeguards for intellectual property and performers.

The open letter argues that stronger protections are needed, particularly when minors are involved, and urges clearer consent frameworks and compensation rules if AI systems are trained using performers’ voices or likenesses.

The issue reflects a wider tension in the entertainment industry as studios, unions and creatives continue to negotiate how AI should be used in film, television and animation without undermining performers’ rights or reshaping the role of human voice actors.

As discussions continue, the debate around Peppa Pig has become one of the most high-profile examples of how AI is reshaping contractual standards in children’s programming and raising new questions about ownership of voice and performance.

Load Next Story