TODAY’S PAPER | May 26, 2026 | EPAPER

Justice beyond courtrooms

A Supreme Court mediation centre is a welcome step, but ADR alone cannot fix Pakistan's justice crisis


Editorial May 13, 2026 1 min read

Pakistan's legal system has long struggled under the weight of delay. Courtrooms across the country remain burdened with millions of pending cases, stretching from civil disputes and land conflicts to commercial disagreements and family matters. For ordinary litigants, justice is often measured not in months, but in years - sometimes decades. In such a system, the growing push towards mediation and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) deserves serious attention, not as a fashionable reform, but as a practical necessity.

The establishment of a court-annexed mediation centre at the Supreme Court reflects an important recognition that conventional litigation alone cannot sustain the demands being placed on Pakistan's courts. The effort to train judges, court officials and legal professionals as mediators, while also offering free mediation services for those unable to afford them, is a welcome attempt to address the widening gap between legal rights and timely justice. The attraction of mediation is that it is quicker and less adversarial, often significantly cheaper than prolonged litigation. Countries across the world have increasingly adopted ADR mechanisms to reduce judicial burdens. Pakistan's own judiciary appears to be drawing lessons from these international models, particularly from Turkiye, where mediation reportedly resolved millions of disputes within a decade.

Yet, it must be understood that mediation is not a cure-all. Pakistan's justice system already suffers from procedural abuse and endless technical delays. If mediation merely becomes another mandatory step before litigation, it risks evolving into yet another layer of bureaucracy rather than a solution. A poorly supervised ADR framework could allow influential parties to pressure weaker litigants into settlements they do not genuinely accept. This risk is especially acute in disputes involving economically vulnerable groups, where power imbalances are stark. The success of ADR in Pakistan will therefore depend on how intelligently it is implemented.

COMMENTS (3)

Rana hassnat saeed adv faisalabad | 1 week ago | Reply In pakistan justice is delayed because population is high and judges are very short and counsels of parties also delayed in appearance in cases which resulted delayed in decision moreover false and fabricated litigation have over burdened cases in courts
Harris Ali | 1 week ago | Reply ADR is model of justice out of courts.The courts cannot adopt a role of Mediator.Executive courts should be established to act as ADR comprising of AC local government chairman union council and a magistrate.police is under control of Executive so to bring disputed parties to attend court and implementation of verdict decision of court will be a matter of eye blink.Right of appeal will go to Deputy commissioner and commissioner with relevant composition and final appeal to Chief minister and prime minister of Pakistan.Appeal of mercy and forgiveness will lie with president of Pakistan.under this Executive judecial model of courts There is no need to have judeciary as separate organ of state.This will save fedral consolidated fund and judecial expenses in form of huge salaries of judges and spare judecial buildings and save the time and money of disputed parties.Judecial salary as special allowance on resolving disputes should be given to members of Executive courts.I hope Government will consider this judecial model of Executive courts and will circulate bill for its approval in the PARLIAMENT.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ