How long should a failed marriage be a woman’s punishment: LHC questions 

In a courtroom moment charged with empathy and urgency, the Lahore High Court on Wednesday raised pointed questions over the prolonged suffering of a woman in a dowry dispute, asking how much more humiliation and punishment she must endure simply because her marriage did not survive.

Hearing a petition filed by Muhammad Arshad, a resident of Depalpur, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani expressed strong concern over the nature and delay of proceedings.

“How much more humiliation does a woman have to face? How much more punishment do you want to give her?” the judge remarked during the hearing.

The petition sought to halt trial proceedings in a family court, where a claim regarding dowry articles and child maintenance had been filed by the woman. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the trial court began proceedings without even receiving their written reply, urging the high court to intervene and stay the process.

However, the court shifted focus toward resolution rather than delay.

Addressing the counsel, Justice Kayani emphasised the lawyer’s responsibility, stating that having charged a fee, it was their duty to help resolve the matter. “You are in a position to settle this dispute,” he observed.

Read: SC asserts co-equal status with FCC

In a striking hypothetical, the judge asked the parties to consider the reverse scenario: “What if the dowry articles were to be returned to the husband? What would the situation be if he had filed the claim?”

He further questioned whether, after the end of a marriage, the return of dowry items should not be a straightforward matter.

The court also highlighted systemic delays, noting that under normal circumstances, such a case might take up to six years to be heard. “Think about what would happen to the woman’s belongings in that time,” the judge remarked.

According to the petitioner’s lawyer, the couple married in 2013 but separated shortly thereafter. The woman later approached the family court seeking recovery of dowry articles and expenses for the child.

Concluding the hearing, the court issued notices to the respondents and adjourned proceedings until next week, expressing hope that the matter could be resolved without prolonged litigation.