Amid Mideast crisis, Pakistan emerges as central actor asserting beyond South Asia: US magazine
The article said that Pakistan's military leadership also played a very important role in peace building in the region. PHOTO: APP
As regional tensions continue to reshape the geopolitical landscape, Pakistan has firmly established itself as a critical player in international diplomacy, effectively stepping into the role of a central mediator in the ongoing crisis between the United States and Iran.
In a recent article, the US-based The National Interest magazine highlights the significance of Islamabad’s evolving role, noting that Pakistan’s military leadership was successfully navigating a complex, high-stakes diplomatic landscape. This shift marks a notable transition for Pakistan, moving it from the periphery of Middle Eastern politics to a central actor.
Following the onset of the current regional conflict, Pakistan’s intervention has been pivotal. In mid-April, under the guidance of Chief of Defence Forces and Chief of the Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir, Islamabad facilitated high-level talks between senior US and Iranian delegations. The engagement, held in Islamabad on April 12–13, marked the first such direct meeting between high-ranking officials from both nations since 1979.
Read More: Pakistan rising: the power of mediation in global conflict
Authored by Canadian journalist Tanya Goudsouzian and Ibrahim al-Marashi, an associate professor at California State University, the article highlights the “non-kinetic potential” of Pakistan’s military leadership, which has enabled the country to facilitate dialogue where conventional diplomacy had stalled.
The military leaders often possess unique capabilities, including direct access to foreign counterparts and the ability to discreetly engage with adversaries, that civilian institutions may lack.
When conventional diplomacy appears to have stalled, the burden of peacemaking falls on those trained for war. Today, in Islamabad, that old logic is once again on display. My latest for @thenatlinterest with @ialmarashi https://t.co/tdSQmVK2bj pic.twitter.com/WENRiu2J8z
The article notes that the country’s military leadership possesses the access, discipline and strategic networks necessary to support de-escalation in high-risk conflicts. It says that Pakistan’s diplomatic weight is attributed to ties with regional actors, including China, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Jordan.
Former foreign secretary Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry, writing on the dynamics of modern diplomacy, noted: “Besides economic and public diplomacy, military diplomacy has emerged as an important element in the diplomatic toolkit. States today leverage the non-kinetic potential of their armed forces to promote foreign policy and national security goals.”
This diplomatic weight is supported by a professional, merit-based system that defines Pakistan’s military establishment. Ambassador Major General (Retd) Tariq Rashid Khan emphasised in an interview that the armed forces operate within a “highly structured, transparent and rigorous system of career progression”, offering a consistency that bolsters Pakistan’s credibility on the international stage.
CDF Munir’s recent diplomatic engagements — ranging from visits to Tehran to high-level meetings with leadership in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar — have further solidified Pakistan’s position. These efforts, including the mutual defence pact signed with Saudi Arabia in September 2025, have projected Pakistan’s influence well beyond South Asia, effectively.
Read More: Pakistan presses on with peace efforts
While the path to a lasting peace remains complex, the efforts spearheaded by Pakistan’s leadership have provided a constructive opening.
By leveraging its strategic relationships and military diplomacy, Pakistan has not only influenced the trajectory of current ceasefire efforts but has redefined its status as an indispensable partner for peace in a volatile, interconnected geopolitical zone.
The op-ed argues that Pakistan is successfully filling a diplomatic vacuum left by weakened traditional mediators, regional divisions, and the limited efficacy of international institutions.