Why Gulf fury is aimed at Tehran, not Washington

Nearly two weeks into the United States-Israeli war ​with Iran, a war-modified, anxiety-riddled version of daily life is emerging in the Gulf.

At a post-Iftar spin class in Doha, the instructor’s usual “positive ‌energy” mantra hit differently on Tuesday: “We need it now more than ever!” Leaving the gym, our phones screeched with another missile alert, and we waited out the blasts in the parking garage. Outside, some security guards now wear white hard hats, flimsy protection against falling shrapnel.

Across the United Arab Emirates, daily life is adjusting too. Dubai beachgoers watched a fighter jet chase a drone overhead, and Ramazan ​cannons have been cancelled to avoid adding more explosions to the mix.

Read: Another Pakistani killed in UAE after missile debris falls during interception

Corporate workers fled offices on Wednesday after Iran threatened US and Israeli financial interests while ​Google Maps glitches keep placing users in the desert or at sea – complicating things for delivery drivers. The UAE is even ⁠turning down the volume on overnight mobile phone alerts, to help residents get a better sleep.

Reuters energy correspondent Yousef Saba, after 12 days spent logging attack after attack ​on Gulf energy facilities, says even a drone strike on a refinery now prompts “cold math” rather than shock – traders and executives simply price it in like a surprise maintenance ​shutdown, he said.

Why Gulf anger is aimed at Tehran – not Washington

Public fury at Washington is notably scarce across the Gulf states, even as they absorb some of the heaviest shocks of a regional war they had urged the US to avoid.

With few exceptions, senior Gulf figures have steered clear of publicly blaming Washington for its decision to confront Iran. Gulf capitals are reserving ​the language of betrayal for Tehran, not for the US, even as American actions helped set the conflict in motion.

A rare public deviation came from Emirati ​tycoon Khalaf Al Habtoor, who briefly challenged Donald Trump over “dragging” the region into war before retracting the comments – a sign, some Gulf sources said, of a tightly contained unease inside Gulf ‌circles about Washington’s ⁠choices.

Aramco CEO Amin Nasser pointedly avoided criticising Washington on Tuesday, even as he warned that the disruption had triggered “a severe chain reaction” with potentially “catastrophic” consequences for global oil markets.

Read More: Oil climbs over 2% as Iran war halts supply

Iran’s behaviour has made this restraint easier to maintain. After years of slow rapprochement – and assurances from Gulf Arab states that their territory would not be used to launch attacks on Iran – many expected Tehran to acknowledge those efforts. Gulf officials had even mounted an intense round of diplomacy in January, warning Washington and Tehran alike that a ​US strike on Iran would trigger exactly ​the kind of regional blowback now ⁠unfolding.

Instead, Iran struck Gulf Arab territory on day one and has rattled Gulf capitals ever since.

Qatar’s Prime Minister called Iran’s moves a “betrayal,” saying they were preplanned and unleashed despite Gulf guarantees of neutrality. Doha had worked to preserve “a peaceful neighbourhood” and facilitate ​US–Iran diplomacy, he said, but Iran’s miscalculation “destroyed everything.”

Gulf states diversify security ties

Still, officials say this is not the moment to ​rethink ties with Washington. ⁠Qatar’s spokesperson Majed Al-Ansari said the US partnership was “not up for question” and that this moment strengthens the case for reinforcing – not diluting – Qatar’s security cooperation with American and European militaries.

Also Read: Gulf states press US to 'neutralise Iran for good' as Hormuz crisis deepens

Yet a wider lesson is sinking in: reliance on a single guarantor has left Gulf states exposed. European countries, not America, have taken a conspicuous role in bolstering regional defences, ⁠from French ​Rafales patrolling Emirati airspace to British Typhoons intercepting threats over Qatar.

The trajectory is not a pivot away from ​Washington but an expansion outward, a Gulf official told Reuters. “Gulf countries expect a major shift in security and defence posture. Not moving away from the US, but diversifying; some might go to China, some ​might go closer to Israel, others to Europe, Turkey, Pakistan or India,” the official said.

Gulf states aren’t breaking with Washington – they’re hedging against what comes next.