Hollow Knight: Silksong listed at $19.99 on GameStop as fans debate Team Cherry’s pricing approach

Hollow Knight: Silksong appears on GameStop at $19.99, sparking debate over Team Cherry’s pricing strategy.

Photo: Team Cherry

Hollow Knight: Silksong has been listed on GameStop for Nintendo Switch at $19.99, sparking widespread discussion among fans about whether the price is genuine or a placeholder ahead of its release.

The listing first surfaced on the Hollow Knight subreddit, where players shared screenshots and attempted to add the game to their carts.

While checkout did not complete, the sight of such a low price has triggered debates about what developer Team Cherry might charge for one of the most anticipated indie games of 2025.

The original Hollow Knight launched in 2017 at $14.99, a modest price for a debut project from a small independent studio.

Team Cherry explained at the time that the goal was accessibility, ensuring as many players as possible could experience the game. That approach resonated strongly, with the title going on to sell more than 15 million copies and being further boosted by significant discounts during sales events.

Given that history, fans are divided on how Silksong should be priced. Some argue that the expanded scale of the sequel and years of anticipation justify a higher price, possibly $40 or even $60.

Others believe Team Cherry may continue its philosophy of affordability, viewing a lower price as a way of acknowledging the community’s support.

One user on Reddit reflected wider sentiment, commenting: “I was ready to pay 40 bucks. Am I crazy? I'm not even as big of a fan as you guys, but it's been the going rate for quality games, especially if they're a sequel to a well loved one.”

The debate has also touched on Game Pass value, with some players noting that a $19.99 launch price could make purchasing outright more attractive than subscribing.

With the release now imminent, it remains to be seen whether the GameStop price reflects Team Cherry’s final decision or is simply a placeholder.

Load Next Story