Jennifer Aniston appears to be embracing a new romance, as she was spotted on a cosy dinner outing in New York City with her rumoured boyfriend, hypnotist Jim Curtis. The pair were joined by longtime friend Jason Bateman and his wife Amanda Anka, making the low-key evening a star-studded double date that’s turned heads across Hollywood.
The outing, which took place at an upscale Manhattan restaurant, marks one of the first public sightings of Aniston and Curtis together. Though neither has officially confirmed the relationship, the couple appeared relaxed and in sync throughout the evening. Curtis, known for his work in wellness and hypnotherapy, has been a notable figure in the holistic space, and his growing presence beside Aniston is fuelling speculation about their bond.
Aniston, 56, has kept her dating life largely private in recent years. However, the sighting has sparked renewed interest in her personal affairs, with fans and media alike curious about this seemingly unexpected pairing. The photos have circulated widely, with many noting the apparent comfort and familiarity between Curtis and Aniston’s inner circle, particularly her close friendship with Bateman, with whom she has worked on multiple films.
Curtis’s presence has already prompted a wave of online reaction. Some fans have expressed surprise over his unusual profession, while others are intrigued by the couple’s potential compatibility, especially given Aniston’s long-standing interest in health and mindfulness.
So far, Aniston has not addressed the rumours, and Curtis has remained equally discreet. Whether the connection is a blossoming romance or just a close friendship, the public’s fascination continues to grow.
With paparazzi now trailing their every step, this new chapter in Aniston’s love life is shaping up to be one of her most talked-about in years.
1732012115-0/Untitled-design-(14)1732012115-0-270x192.webp "punjab govt grants lifetime pensions to widows")
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ