USC closure

The government's decision to shutter the loss-making Utility Stores Corporation (USC) by the end of July is a painful but necessary corrective to decades of fiscal bleeding. Between July and December 2024 alone, USC lost over Rs6 billion and has net liabilities of over Rs50 billion. Meanwhile, despite offering low prices, USC actually saw sales crash by 50% in recent times.

This also puts the estimated Rs29 billion needed for golden handshakes into perspective. If no action was taken, USC would have spent the same amount just to keep running over the next few years. Although the government is considering limiting payouts to only 5,217 'regular' employees, after wasting billions for decades, skimping on severance pay is not the way to go.

Future savings can still be reallocated to more productive initiatives that support low-income citizens. In the meantime, the government must ensure price control enforcement in areas that were highly reliant on utility stores to minimise the impact of closures on shoppers who actually relied on them. While a resolution for USC appears nearly finalised, progress on the much-publicised privatisation deals of other SOEs has been minimal.

PIA has failed to attract suitable bidders despite multiple attempts, and the recent deal with Russia to revive Pakistan Steel Mills may backfire. None of the two dozen SOEs up for privatisation have sparked the kind of interest that would inspire government confidence.

The closure of USC proves the government can make tough choices. Now, it must accelerate the pace of decision-making - from years to weeks — because, like USC, many state-owned enterprises are losing so much money that waiting to sell them for cents on the dollar could end up being more costly than shutting them down and salvaging what remains.