Diddy trial defense may cite Iran conflict to slam Homeland Security

Sean “Diddy” Combs’ high-profile criminal trial is approaching its conclusion, with the prosecution expected to rest its case by Tuesday.

Now, Diddy’s defense team is reportedly preparing unconventional closing arguments, potentially referencing the escalating U.S.-Iran military conflict to criticize federal involvement in his case.

According to TMZ, the defense may argue that the Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) unit focused on policing Diddy’s private life instead of addressing urgent global threats. One potential argument cited: “This was a manufactured case of bedroom police instigated by Homeland Security Investigations, and rather than worrying about what Diddy is doing with baby oil and lube, HSI should worry more about the escalating conflict with Iran.”

The reference follows recent U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites and Iran’s retaliatory missile strike on a U.S. military base in Qatar. The international conflict began on June 13 when Israel launched attacks on Iranian facilities, drawing in U.S. forces.

Diddy is currently facing five serious federal charges, including one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion, and two counts of transporting individuals for prostitution. If convicted on all counts, the 54-year-old music mogul could face life in prison.

On Monday, special agent Joseph Cerciello of HSI testified as the government’s summary witness, confirming he reviewed hours of explicit video footage and presented messages showing Diddy allegedly negotiating with escort services.

The defense is not expected to call any witnesses and will instead submit evidence before closing statements begin. A charging conference is scheduled for Wednesday, with closing summations on Thursday.