Trump breaks tradition by not placing hand on Bible during oath of office: 'So does it still count?'

Trump’s decision not to place his hand on a Bible raises questions about protocol and tradition.

Courtesy: AP

Donald Trump’s second inauguration on January 20, 2025, made waves for more than just marking the start of his second term. During his swearing-in, Trump opted to skip the tradition of placing his hand on a Bible—an act that has become a symbolic part of the presidential oath of office since George Washington’s inauguration. This unexpected moment quickly drew attention, both online and from commentators, raising questions about the reasoning behind the president's decision.

Chief Justice John Roberts administered the oath, instructing Trump to raise his right hand and repeat the words after him. As Roberts said, "I, Donald John Trump," First Lady Melania Trump stepped forward holding a stack of Bibles—one of which was the Lincoln Bible, and the other Trump’s personal Bible, gifted to him when he graduated from Sunday School. But instead of placing his left hand on the books, Trump kept his hand at his side and proceeded with the oath.

Trump’s team did not immediately comment on the reasoning behind the move, leaving much to speculation. Some online commentators thought that Roberts may have rushed the ceremony, while others couldn’t hide their disbelief. The absence of the Bible led many on social media to crack jokes or express concerns about the president’s respect for tradition.

One Twitter user quipped, "He was afraid his hand would burn if he put it on the Bible and lied." Another wondered, "So does it still count? Hearing rumors he can’t lift his hand above his waist. Could that be the reason?"

Load Next Story