Trisha Paytas accused of copying Taylor Swift's 'Eras' name and aesthetic for 2025 tour

Trisha Paytas fans react to her tour announcement, passing it off as a parody of Taylor Swift's 'Eras Tour'.


Pop Culture & Art January 17, 2025
Photo: Instagram/AP

On Thursday January 16, Youtube star Trisha Paytas took to social media to announce the details of her upcoming 2025 The Eras of Trish Tour which kicks off on February 20 in Indianapolis and runs through June. 

Soon after Paytas' announcement, fans of both the youtuber as well as Taylor Swift started reacting to what is nlow being dubbed as a parody of Swift's of Eras Tour.

This was due to the use of the term 'eras' which is popularly associated with the pop star as well as her costume which Paytas blatantly copied. On the tour poster, Paytas posed wearing a bodysuit that looked extremely similar to Atelier Versace's bejeweled version that Swift wore during her Lover set.

Taylor Swift wore a strappy bejeweled silver pink and blue bodysuit by Versace during the 'Lover' set at the Eras Tour (AP)

Taylor Swift wore a strappy bejeweled silver pink and blue bodysuit by Versace during the 'Lover' set at the Eras Tour (AP)

"CAN’T WAIT TO PERFORM AND HUG YOU 🤗.”, Paytas captioned the announcement post on Instagram, along with information about the availability of the tickets. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Trisha Paytas Hacmon (@trishapaytasbackup)

 

On social media platform X, some users called out the Just Trish podcast host for ripping off Swift's look and aesthetic while other questioned if this was even legal due to copyright issues.

Others simply focused on the actual tour itself and expressed excitement at the prospect of attending.

 

Speaking about the tour on her podcast, Paytas earlier mentioned that it would be based on different eras of her life and would include songs from her upcoming album scheduled to release on February 15.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ