Criminal misconduct

What does it say about our justice system when those sworn to protect citizens become the very source of harm? Eight Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD) officials stand accused of a grave betrayal of public trust. On Monday, these officials were arrested in connection with a kidnapping for ransom case, raising serious concerns about the misuse of power within law enforcement.

The allegations are that two individuals were abducted and released only after ransom money was paid. This is not an isolated incident of professional misconduct and criminal misuse of authority. It reflects a broader, systemic failure to hold those in power accountable. The CTD, which is supposed to be a bulwark against terrorist incidents, risks becoming a symbol of unchecked authority and impunity if such behaviour goes unpunished. Incidents like this erode public confidence in law enforcement, creating a dangerous environment where citizens feel unprotected and vulnerable. The lack of trust stems from several factors. For one, accountability within law enforcement remains weak. Officers accused of misconduct often evade justice due to their connections or the systemic inefficiencies in internal disciplinary mechanisms. Secondly, citizens frequently face apathy or hostility when seeking redress, making them reluctant to engage with law enforcement even when they are in need of protection. This distrust erodes the social contract between the state and its citizens.

A zero-tolerance policy is essential to address such misconduct. Law enforcement agencies must implement robust internal accountability mechanisms and allow independent oversight to monitor their actions. Officers found guilty of criminal behaviour must face severe consequences, sending a clear message that corruption and abuse will not be tolerated. Ultimately, the state has a responsibility to ensure that institutions like the CTD operate with integrity.