Elon Musk condemns government euthanization of Peanut the Squirrel, sparks debate on animal rights

In a recent outburst on his X account, tech billionaire Elon Musk expressed outrage over the euthanization of Peanut the Squirrel, a beloved pet and internet celebrity. The New York state authorities' decision to euthanize Peanut has been met with intense scrutiny, with Musk calling it a clear example of “government overreach.” He characterized the seizure of Peanut from his owner as a “kidnapping,” and described the subsequent euthanization as an “execution.”

Musk's fiery posts have sparked widespread discussion among his followers, many of whom are questioning the government's role in regulating pet ownership. In a striking analogy, Musk compared the situation to that of John Wick’s dog, stating, “John Wick just wanted peace, but then they killed his innocent, beloved dog.” He further asserted, “Government overreach kidnapped an orphan squirrel and executed him,” and provocatively claimed that “Donald Trump would save the squirrels,” appealing to the former president's supporters for solidarity.
 

The case has led to a growing online movement calling for "justice for Peanut," with supporters creating AI-generated images of Peanut in MAGA hats and on Trump’s shoulder. Conservative filmmaker Robby Starbuck echoed Musk’s sentiments, suggesting that if Trump were to mention Peanut in a campaign speech, it could significantly impact his electoral prospects.

The New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) explained that the decision to euthanize Peanut and a raccoon that shared his home was made after a person was bitten by the squirrel, raising concerns about potential rabies exposure. The DEC stated that the animals were confiscated on October 30 due to violations of state wildlife laws, leading to their euthanization for rabies testing.

The public reaction to this incident highlights the ongoing debate over animal rights, government intervention, and personal freedoms in pet ownership. Musk's comments continue to resonate, prompting discussions about the balance between state regulations and individual liberties concerning beloved pets.