Disney backs down from controversial arbitration clause in wrongful death lawsuit

Disney has reversed its position on a wrongful death lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Piccolo, whose wife died from a severe allergic reaction after a meal at a Disney World restaurant. Initially, Disney sought to move the case to arbitration, citing a clause in the Disney+ terms and conditions that Mr. Piccolo had agreed to during a free trial in 2019.

However, following widespread criticism, Disney has now waived its right to arbitration, allowing the case to proceed in court. The company acknowledged the "sensitive approach" required in dealing with such a tragic loss.

Mr. Piccolo's lawyers welcomed the decision, stating that they will continue to pursue justice for his wife and raise awareness about food allergies.

Disney's initial move to enforce the arbitration clause drew sharp criticism, with legal experts labeling it a "novel" and "potentially far-reaching" interpretation of contract law.

The case highlights the growing scrutiny of arbitration clauses, which are often used by corporations to avoid costly and public court battles.