Pakistan’s workforce, once a valuable asset in the global labour market, now faces a significant crisis of reputation. Recent reports presented to the Senate Standing Committee on Overseas Pakistanis reveal that employers in the Gulf region are increasingly turning away from Pakistani labour in favour of workers from other countries such as Bangladesh. This shift is attributed to concerns over the skill levels, behaviour and overall reliability of Pakistani workers. The consequences of this tarnished reputation are severe, impacting not only the individuals affected but also the broader economic stability of Pakistan.
The repercussions are dire. Remittances from overseas workers, a lifeline for many Pakistani families and a vital part of the national economy, are at risk. At the heart of this issue lies the failure to invest in skill development and proper training. Unlike Bangladesh, which has prioritised vocational training and skill enhancement, Pakistan has lagged behind. The result is a labour force that is ill-equipped to meet the demands of modern labour markets. Behavioural issues further compound the problem. Reports of misconduct and the presence of organised begging rings have tarnished the reputation of Pakistani workers. Such actions not only tarnish the reputation of the individuals involved but also cast a long shadow over the entire Pakistani workforce.
The government must make it mandatory to achieve behavioural and professional training certificates before allowing the workers to step onto new soil. These certifications should be designed to educate workers on the legal and cultural expectations of their host countries. A practical step forward is in increasing diplomatic efforts to engage with Gulf countries to address their concerns and rebuild trust in Pakistani labour. This involves addressing current issues and establishing long-term agreements to protect workers’ rights and interests.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ