Analysts laud formation of commission to probe judges’ allegations

Analysts have stressed the importance of a clear and transparent investigation into alleged interference in judiciary affairs, particularly regarding pressure on judges.

This call for transparency came during the political talk show, "Experts," aired on Express News, where Naveed Hussain, Chief Editor of The Express Tribune, highlighted the necessity to focus on discussing alleged interference in the judiciary.

Hussain pointed out that a significant majority of judges from the Islamabad High Court (IHC) had submitted a letter to the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC), outlining grave allegations. He argued against victim-blaming, likening it to questioning why certain past judicial decisions took so long to rectify.

However, not all on the panel shared the same sentiment. Amir Ilyas Rana, Express News Bureau Chief in Islamabad, criticised the IHC judges for not providing specific evidence of executive meddling. He argued that the judges should have taken action against those pressuring them by holding them in contempt of court.

Similarly, Faisal Husain, Express News Bureau Chief in Karachi, expressed fears of suppression through the formation of an inquiry commission. He questioned the efficacy of previous commissions and warned of potential consequences, urging proactive decisions.

Read more: Political analysts say PTI being ‘pushed to the brink’

He foresees the emergence of a new lawyers' movement and believes it could have even greater significance than previous ones. He suggested paying heed to the signs and making timely decisions accordingly.

He emphasised the necessity of establishing an inquiry commission. He stated that the commission's head should be someone trustworthy and credible, and he should request evidence from the relevant judges.

Mohammad Ilyas, Express News Bureau Chief in Lahore, echoed similar sentiments, emphasising the need for timely action by the judges.

He commended the prime minister's initiative in forming a commission but stressed the importance of thorough interrogation to uncover any undue influence on judicial decisions.