SIC chairman refutes refusal of reserved seats in letter to ECP

Hamid Raza asserts letter sent to ECP is being misconstrued

Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC) Chairman Hamid Raza. PHOTO: TWITTER/FILE

Chairman of the Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC), Hamid Raza, has categorically denied refusing to take reserved seats in a letter addressed to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

The statement from Raza follows the ECP's reservation of its verdict on petitions related to the allocation of reserved seats to the SIC.

Addressing the media in Islamabad on Wednesday, Raza asserted that the letter sent to the ECP is being misconstrued.

The electoral watchdog, ECP, was conducting a hearing on applications regarding the allocation of reserved seats to the SIC. This political party has become a haven for independent lawmakers aligned with the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) after the PTI lost its electoral symbol in the lead-up to the February 8 elections.

During the hearing, Chief Election Commissioner Sikandar Sultan Raja presented a letter from the SIC to the PTI counsel, stating that the party did not participate in the general elections and therefore did not desire the reserved seats.

PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan and lawyer Ali Zafar, along with Raza, appeared before the electoral watchdog for the hearing.

Zafar expressed ignorance about the letter, stating that the SIC had not informed PTI about any such decision. In response, CEC Raja questioned the insistence on the allotment of reserved seats if the SIC had expressed a lack of interest.

In a media interaction after the hearing, Raza clarified that the ECP routinely sends letters to all parties after general elections, specifying a five per cent quota for women in the distribution of tickets. He emphasised that the letter in question was not exclusive to the SIC but addressed to all participating parties.

Also read: ECP reserves verdict in SIC seats case

Raza stated that since his party did not participate in the elections, the SIC informed the ECP about its non-participation, and therefore, they had no list to allocate 5 per cent of tickets to women. He clarified that the SIC did not express a refusal for reserved seats, and their letter did not mention any such rejection.

"We have a letter, and there is no mention of reserved seats in this letter," Raza maintained. "It should be read on the basis of Article 206 of the Constitution. My affidavit is also available, which says if we contest elections, we will take reserved seats."

Raza concluded by asserting that his letter had been distorted and misinterpreted and left the decision on the matter to the ECP's discretion. "It is the will of the Chief Election Commissioner to interpret it whichever way he deems fit," he stated.

Load Next Story