Similar questions are being asked in Britain but in a somewhat abstract form in the absence of a written constitution. In light of all this, there is a serious effort in many parts of the West to push the state back from some of the space it now occupies. If that were to happen — and there is a strong probability that it will — this new and considerably limited role of the state in many western societies will create opportunities for the populous countries of South Asia if the countries in the region work together and come up with a new strategy of growth. This is where demography enters the picture.
There is a profound asymmetry in the way demographic situations are developing in the West and in the populous countries of South Asia. The rate of human fertility has declined sharply in most countries in the West. The result of this is that a number of countries are now seeing the size of their populations declining while those in South Asia will continue to increase for several decades. The South Asian populations will remain young for several more decades while those in the West will age rapidly. The demographic change in the West will have two consequences. One, it will not have young people in the number needed by the economies where knowledge rather than material inputs are the main contributors to growth. In most western countries, the structure of the economy is dominated by the service sector and within the service sector by knowledge intensive activities. This means that the workforce needed for these types of economies must be very well-trained in modern skills. This also means that the state and the companies must invest large amounts in research development. Some of the major developments of the last few decades, including the development of the internet, became possible with the heavy involvement of the state.
Government support for research, development and skill development would be placed in jeopardy if political forces such as the Tea Party Movement in the United Sates carry the day. This would seriously compromise the ability of the United States and other western countries to deliver the services and products the citizens of these countries need and will demand. This is where the populous countries of South Asia enter the picture. If they can organise their own governments to produce the manpower needed by the new economies, they should be able to fill the gap and become major suppliers to the West. However, before they are able to do this, they will need to have an effective state that can prepare the citizenry to take up this challenge and realise its opportunity. Unfortunately, most South Asian states, for several different reasons, are seeing the weakening of the state.
There is now palpable unhappiness on the part of the citizenry in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan with the working of the state. In Bangladesh, the state has been weakened by the enormous rivalry between two political groups that have been fighting it out to control the state. In India, there is popular disgust at the incidents of major corruption committed by senior public officials, both elected and non-elected. In Pakistan, the civilian government has not proved equal to the task of handling the various problems the country faces.
The obvious conclusion to be drawn from this is that while the West is presenting an extraordinary opportunity to turn South Asia’s young populations into enormous economic assets, the South Asian states themselves will have to improve their performance. Those who are weak states will not be up to the challenge.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 5th, 2011.
COMMENTS (13)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@shouvikmukho:
You are right. But, only when it comes to Economics. Indians consider their Democracy better than Chinese Communist-Authoritarianism.
@Arindom: Author should also see that ,there are 80000 Indian students in US universities, some of the Multinationals have research & development wing in India,Indian software engineers, doctors and Financial experts are already working in large numbers in US etc.Issue of Corruption in no way blocking skill development in India as pointed by Author but extremism certainly in whole south asia.
I do not think India is on same footing with Pakistan regarding the knowledge and skill development e.g at present 80,000 Indian students are in US universities,while only 6000 Pakistani student.Indian software Engineers are all over the world.US media is doing program on Indian Educational Institution like 60 minutes on IIT. Industrial & IT Giants have research & development arm in India.
@BruteForce: really ? now you are just lying.the indian media is full of news stories about pakistan. Any international ranking on corruption or HDI, Indians look for where pakistan is on that ranking.Truth is India is obsessed with pakistan,despite the fact it was pakistan which took the bulk of the loses during Independence
Does India really want to be equated with China? I don't think so. I think in terms of population there is a natural equation, and in terms of India's goal concerning GDP per capita targets, China would also be a good comparison, but apart from this I don't think people from either country would like comparisons to be made.
@BruteForce: Good observation and my 2 cents: Indians want to be equated with China. The Chinese get irritated when this happens since Chinese want to be equated with US. And the US do not wnat to be equated with anyone!
Indians get irritated when Pakistanis compare India with Pakistan. Pakistanis dont think twice before doing so. And, Pakistan is a Country which didn't want to be India. So much irony in the World.
Yes, demographic dividends are possible if the spend on Education is increased manifold. The future is Technology and the opportunity must be grabbed. These dividends can only be harnessed if the population is deradicalised, not when an individual is willing to kill in the name of Religion or a perceived slight.
I am happy, I equated Pakistan with India !
Dr. Burki, I understand your quest but am finding it hard to tie together the theoretical perspectives of the state and changing demography of the world. In case of Pakistan, it is what Lucian Pye called state’s "inability to penetrate." I am not a demographer but population growth in Pakistan depicts a very grim picture.
While clubbing India, Bangladesh and Pakistan together - while correct ipso facto, the author would do well to look at the unique situation in Pakistan that is different from both India and Bangladesh - the rise of Islamic extremism especially among the youth and the benign, even encouraging view of the state and society to it.
This is too facile an analysis. The fallacy of the notion that numbers will determine who is left standing is being proved every day of the week, every week of the year right now in Pakistan itself. It is not so much the quantity but the quality of human beings a nation has that determines what its standing will be. That is precisely why a nation with about 300 million is the King of the Hill right now and has been so, compared to the billions other nations have. China, with a billion plus is just a sweat shop, turning out cheap and shoddy goods to American designs on machines America has supplied with the capital America has provided for the American market mainly. Most of their stuff is sold in dollar stores. And so is India, even though not to the same extent. I am glad India did not go the China way because endemic to its (China's) situation is the same fate as experienced by Japan. In the sixties and seventies of the last century, world could not have enough of what Japan produced again, to American designs, on American machines with American capital for mainly American market. Today, Japan's economy is seriously, seriously sick! No, emphatically, South Asia should not hitch its wagon to the star of the West! I know it would be anathema to many in this area but the Indian model of catering mainly to local demand is the best long-term solution!