Plea against 'misuse' of public funds on ads

Names of prime minister, chief minister and federal govt included as respondents in case


Our Correspondent June 04, 2022
Shehbaz Sharif. PHOTO: EXPRESS

print-news
LAHORE:

A petition has been filed in the Lahore High Court (LHC) against Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Punjab Chief Minister Hamza Shehbaz for "misusing" public funds for political ads.

The petition was filed by Mushkoor Hussain through advocate Nadeem Sarwar.

Names of the prime minister, chief minister and the federal government have been included as respondents in the case.

The petition has taken the position that the government's extravagant spending on ads was at odds with its claims that it lacked the money to run the state affairs.

“The country is currently going through the worst economic situation and owes billions of rupees in foreign debt, the petitioner maintained, citing the government’s talks with International Monetary Fund (IMF) to revive the bailout package.

He contended that both Shehbaz Sharif and his son Hamza Shehbaz were squandering money on newspaper advertisements for “self-promotion” and cited PM Shehbaz’s recent widely-advertised visit to Turkey.

“A publicity campaign was launched for Hamza Shehbaz's clean water project from the state exchequer,” he added.

The petition prayed the court to restrain the government from using public funds for its advertising campaign and deposit the expenses incurred on the exchequer back to the treasury.                                                                                                               

COMMENTS (2)

Naz | 2 years ago | Reply Please.stop witchhunting. PTI is using the same slogan and the. the language which it used during it reign of almost 4 years. Also please don t waste courts time. Let.them work on the pending cases. Thanks
Shama Zia | 2 years ago | Reply It is high time.These scoundrels need to be restrained
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ