LHC orders release of TLP chief

Court declares second detention of proscribed TLP chief illegal


Our Correspondent October 02, 2021
Saad Hussain Rizvi. PHOTO: FILE

LAHORE:

The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Friday declared the second detention of proscribed Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) chief Saad Rizvi illegal and ordered his release.

Justice Tariq Saleem Sheikh heard the plea by Rizvi's counsel, in which the federal and provincial governments, the chief secretary, home secretary, inspector general police and other respondents in the case. According to the petitioner's counsel, Rizvi, following his detention, was named in 14 different cases. He added that the review board of LHC had refused to extend the TLP chief's detention.

He claimed in court that his client's party was a purely religious organisation and had nothing to do with the country's politics. However, he maintained, the government arrested several leaders of the party on a political basis and put them in detention over threat to public peace.

Read ATC grants bail to 150 TLP workers

The counsel said Rizvi was produced before the review board of LHC after three months in prison but the board did not extend his detention. The lawyer requested the court to declare the detention illegal and restrain the government from arresting the TLP chief in other cases. Subsequently, the court declared Rizvi's detention illegal and ordered his release from jail.

Saad is the son of the firebrand cleric and previous head of the TLP, Khadim Hussain Rizvi, who died in November last year.

He was arrested after TLP's central council warned the government that if it did not expel the French ambassador from the country, they would march towards Islamabad.

The banned outfit called off its violent protests after the federal government tabled a resolution in parliament to debate the French ambassador's expulsion.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 2nd, 2021.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ