London court rejects bid to stop PM Johnson's suspension of parliament
Miller tells reporters outside court that parliament should be sitting during this crucial time
A demonstrator holds a banner, during an anti-Brexit protest, outside the Houses of Parliament in London. PHOTO: Reuters
LONDON:
London’s High Court on Friday rejected a legal challenge against British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s suspension of parliament before Brexit but said it could still be taken to the Supreme Court (SC) for a final appeal.
Johnson announced at the end of August that he would suspend parliament from mid-September to mid-October, just before Britain is due to leave the European Union (EU) on October 31, so the government could announce a new legislative programme.
That prompted campaigner Gina Miller, who defeated the government over another Brexit issue two years ago, to bring a legal challenge. She was later joined in the process by former Prime Minister John Major and opposition political parties.
Miller told reporters outside court that parliament should be sitting during such a crucial time for Britain’s democracy, and she would not give up the fight.
Delay Brexit? I'd rather be dead in a ditch: British PM
“The Supreme Court has pencilled on September 17 for the appeal hearing,” she said. “My legal team and I will not give up the fight for democracy.”
Miller’s lawyer, David Pannick, argued on Thursday that comments from Johnson showed an important part of his reasoning for the prorogation, or suspension, was that parliament might say or do something that impeded the government’s Brexit plans.
The legal challenge has lost some of its impact after lawmakers voted this week to force Johnson to seek a three-month delay to Brexit rather than leave without an agreement on October 31, a move that is likely to lead to an election.
Separate legal challenges to Johnson’s Brexit plans are also being heard in Scotland and Northern Ireland.
London’s High Court on Friday rejected a legal challenge against British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s suspension of parliament before Brexit but said it could still be taken to the Supreme Court (SC) for a final appeal.
Johnson announced at the end of August that he would suspend parliament from mid-September to mid-October, just before Britain is due to leave the European Union (EU) on October 31, so the government could announce a new legislative programme.
That prompted campaigner Gina Miller, who defeated the government over another Brexit issue two years ago, to bring a legal challenge. She was later joined in the process by former Prime Minister John Major and opposition political parties.
Miller told reporters outside court that parliament should be sitting during such a crucial time for Britain’s democracy, and she would not give up the fight.
Delay Brexit? I'd rather be dead in a ditch: British PM
“The Supreme Court has pencilled on September 17 for the appeal hearing,” she said. “My legal team and I will not give up the fight for democracy.”
Miller’s lawyer, David Pannick, argued on Thursday that comments from Johnson showed an important part of his reasoning for the prorogation, or suspension, was that parliament might say or do something that impeded the government’s Brexit plans.
The legal challenge has lost some of its impact after lawmakers voted this week to force Johnson to seek a three-month delay to Brexit rather than leave without an agreement on October 31, a move that is likely to lead to an election.
Separate legal challenges to Johnson’s Brexit plans are also being heard in Scotland and Northern Ireland.