Justice Mazhar Ali Akbar Naqvi asked the petitioner's counsel whether he wants the FIRs to be quashed. The counsel replied that the petitioner wants an order from the court which declares the FIRs illegal. The counsel contended that there is a similarity in all the FIRs. He added the first and the last ones mentioned by his side had the same content. However, the bench issued a notice to the respondent SHO and sought a reply on the matter in two weeks. It also asked that he appear before the court in person.
Hafiz Saeed booked as Punjab moves to choke terror financing
Petitioner Malik Zafar Iqbal contended in his petition that there were 23 FIRs registered at different police stations against 68 respondents, including Hafiz Saeed and others, under false charges. He said the impugned FIRs described the petitioner as the head of Lashkar-e-Taiba. He claimed this was both factually and legally incorrect.
He submitted that petitioner Hafiz Saeed and others are not the members of Lashkar-e-Tayyaba as was held in a full bench order of the LHC in 2009. “The federal and provincial government had challenged this order in the Supreme Court, but it was upheld and therefore withdrawn. The petitioners have no nexus with Lashkar-e-Taiba”.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 28th, 2019.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ