CJP against over 5% annual increase in school fees

Khosa asks private schools to surrender licences if they required over 5% increase


Our Correspondent May 08, 2019
PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD: The chief justice of Pakistan has said private schools requiring more than five per cent annual increase in fees should surrender their licences.

A three-member apex court bench, headed by CJP Asif Saeed Khosa, heard the case pertaining to exorbitant fees being charged by private schools on Tuesday.

CJP Khosa remarked, “Everyone knows what happens in schools. They are making profits in billions of rupees.”

The CJP inquired as to how private schools were entitled to charge separately for Halloween parties?

Counsel for private schools Makhdoom Ali Khan maintained that the fee structure given by the schools presented details of all other charges in addition to the tuition fees.

Fresh graduates not up to the mark: Punjab education minister

“Money for trips are always charged separately,” said the counsel.

Justice Ijazul Ahsan said schools were charging separately for trips and other days while also asking students to bring cakes in the name of cake day.

The CJP said items brought by children were usually taken away by the teachers.

“The students are never given things they bring to school,” he said.

Parents of private school students said lack of discipline in private educational institutions was giving way to use of drugs by schoolchildren while private schools were also promoting a western way of living.

The CJP remarked that if the parents were not satisfied with the school environment, they should change the school of their children.

“No one has forced you to get your child enrolled at the private school,” said the CJP, adding that parents who disliked days like Halloween, Valentine’s as well as concerts should look elsewhere.

“The court is not responsible for the system of schooling,” he said, adding that the judiciary was meant to oversee law.

The parents said 5% annual increase in school fees was bearable.

The CJP replied that the court would decide the case keeping in view the interest of the parents and other stakeholders.

“Basic rights cannot be returned but they can be regulated,” said the CJP. “Provision of education as well as regulating the private schools is the duty of the state.”

Digital education must to improve literacy rate

Counsel Makhdoom Ali Khan said the void created by the state’s educational system was filled by private schools.

“The private schools formulate their programmes in line with modern standards of education and also ensure training of their teachers,” he added.

The CJP said any school needing more than 5% increase in annual fees should surrender its license.

“If the business of private schools is not doing well, their owners may look for business opportunities elsewhere,” said Khosa, adding that everyone knew how the schools were being run nowadays.

“They make enormous amounts of money on account of uniforms and books as well. The schools are earning in billions of rupees. Any loss the schools report is actually a cut in the profits they have been previously getting,” he added.

Justice Ahsan said some private schools had even made their own colleges and universities.

Ahsan suggested that schools should wait at least three years for an extraordinary increase in fees.

The CJP adjourned the hearing of the case till today (Wednesday) and asked all parties to complete their arguments as the case needed to be wrapped up without any delay.

COMMENTS (1)

A Asghar | 4 years ago | Reply Curtailing fees for the sake of parents is one aspect of the overall equation Honorable Chief Justice of Pakistan. But please do pay attention to the other aspect as well. Since the time your predecessor took the suo moto decision on this matter it has become a source of great uncertainty and anxiety amongst the employees of these education institutions. In order to still have the same profit margins as before, the management of these institutions have started laying off teachers and other staff, reducing salaries of the existing staff and not paying them during the summer months. On one hand relief is granted to the parents, which is a good thing no doubt, but on the other hand the staff of these education institutions have started to face hardship, job insecurity and reduced pays. Is this true justice where one side is being given relief at the cost of livelihood of the other affected party? Why couldn't these decision be taken by viewing the whole equation in it's entriety? The previous CJ took suo motto of a valid issue but unfortunately gave a very myopic verdict by not taking all affected parties into account. Teachers are the building blocks of this nation. They have a tremendous responsibility to groom the future generations. Already this noble profession is not a highly paid one to begin with and just imagine how many lives are being affected under these new circumstances. Summer is just a month away and I humbly request you Chief Justice Sahib to please scrutinise all aspects and then take a decision which is a win-win for all.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ