Storm clouds

The storm clouds are back, and global economy is threatened by global credit crisis likely to hit sovereign debt.


Khurram Husain June 22, 2011
Storm clouds

Excuse me for interrupting this very important moment of lucidity, I know it’s not everyday that an opportunity comes by to hold our armed forces and their ancillary apparatus for covert war accountable for their countless crimes. But we have a serious problem on our hands. It looks like the Great Financial Crisis of 2008 is coming back.

And it doesn’t end there — this time it looks even uglier than it did back then. It appears more and more so that the three or so years that have gone by since that fateful autumn of 2008, signalled by the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the frantic bailout of AIG, were nothing but a short interlude, a very short interlude, in a single crisis that is shaping up to be everything that 2008 was feared to be: Another Great Depression, a crisis that marks a comprehensive rupture between one era and the next.

All the bailouts and all the stimuli that were administered at the time to first shore up, then clean out bank balance sheets and to get banks to start lending again have had one major consequence: They have transferred the problem from private hands into government hands. What was a banking crisis has now returned as a sovereign debt crisis, with far bigger implications and no bailout options available.

What is clear is that the recovery that the stimulus spending of 2009 brought about was strong enough to arrest the slide of advanced economies into a catastrophic depression, but never gathered enough momentum to pay off the debts that had been incurred in the process. That leaves the advanced economies in a terrible bind now, either borrow more and continue spending to save the economy, or abandon the stimulus and retrench spending to save the government. That’s literally the choice now, try and rescue the economy, or rescue the government.

When the financial crisis of 2008 arrived, it caught us in our favourite posture: Happily in denial. ‘No impact on Pakistan’ was the refrain doing the rounds throughout 2008. Of course, everybody who subscribed to this thinking was sorely mistaken, and for a variety of reasons. Topping the list of these reasons is sheer mental incapacity to understand anything about the economy, ours or any other.

Our businessmen, who were on screen after screen happily reciting the ‘no impact’ line, know little about anything beyond the very narrow and specific vested interests of their racket. The go-to economists for the media in those days were the diminutive tribe of rent-a-hack that populated the brokerages and their ‘research’ divisions. None of them had the permission to say that Pakistan has important vulnerabilities in the event of a global credit crunch, and none wanted the permission either.

Nothing exemplified this state of denial better than the budget announced in June 2008. The budget saw outlays increased by almost 30 per cent, revenue receipts projected to increase by almost 25 per cent and the development budget hiked by 20 per cent. It was as if there is no storm gathering on the world economy, no ability to see that serious economic challenges were coming our way. Total denial; even the budget speech made no mention of the dangers stalking global markets.

Today, the storm clouds are back, and the global economy is threatened by a global credit crisis that is likely to hit sovereign debt in the advanced economies and then ripple outwards. Like in 2008, we are extremely vulnerable. Our levels of government debt are unsustainable already, avenues for foreign bailouts are even more limited than they were in 2008, the fiscal situation is more precarious than it was then, relations with great powers are in tatters and international goodwill and credibility are non-existent. And one more time, we’ve announced an unrealistic budget in the middle of it all, whose revenue needs will push us deeper into the crisis by forcing us to borrow more.

We do not know the extent of the coming crisis and how far it can carry us. What is that they say about those who don’t learn from history?

Published in The Express Tribune, June 23rd, 2011.

COMMENTS (15)

Ali Farid | 13 years ago | Reply Perhaps you may even want to add Paul the Octopus to the list of people who predicted it. His forecast would have probably carried similar effect as Roubini's. Economics, is not a science and predicting such events is no mathematics. I totally understand and appreciate the point you are trying to make in the article. But it is the simplicity of the narrative used which is questionable. I am sure even if you digg deap into research papers being published by SBP/PIDE/ etc etc you will find people discussing these issues and their impact. I am sure Aqib can send you many such reports which he was writing back in even 2004! Forget 2008, even right now if you can find a single person on this planet who can claim that he can assess the potential impact of the greek default do tell him to please stand up... because he might have the chance to become the richest person on earth! :) I know many journalists in Pakistan would be always ready to make such claim.
Khurram Husain | 13 years ago | Reply @Meekal Ahmed: Always good to hear from you Sir. @Haider Hussain: For what its worth, yes Wall St firms had a blinkered outlook in the days leading up to the crisis, although there were plenty of people there who knew better, even if they didn't go public with their wisdom at the time. Also agreed that we have very few economists who actually study the economy, most are busy chasing consultancies. I remember once when Dr Salman Shah, as advisor to Finance Minister (2005), had come to LUMS to deliver a talk, and he castigated the assembled faculty there for not producing any research on the country's business/economic problems. He used the March 2005 stock market crash as the example, saying that the country's "premier business school" didn't produce a single paper studying the crash. There are so many more examples since then, for example has anybody studied the Dewan bankruptcy, or the performance of our banks after their privatization? But I do NOT agree that we remained disentangled, and the reasons given by you here were being given back then too. The crisis came here in exactly the same form as it came anywhere else: a credit crunch (banks stopped lending), collapsing stock market, followed by prolonged recession. The skyrocketing portfolio of NPLs in our banking system since then only shows that our banks had their fair share of "subprime" assets, and collapsing real estate prices had their impact on bank balance sheets as these were preferred collateral in the heydeys of surging bank liquidity. We had a few ingredients of our own though, collapsing reserves and skyrocketing inflation for instance. But in so many ways, our economic crisis of Nov 2008 bore too many similarities to the global crisis to be a coincidence, we need to understand the ways in which we are entangled. @Ali Farid Khwaja: there are plenty of examples. The first institutional acknowledgement of the crisis was probably the August 2007 monetary policy of the Federal Reserve where the tigthening of federal funds rate was abruptly stopped and reversed. The lending windows opened by the Fed since then also show they were aware of and trying to tackle the crisis long before it became a full fledged economic crisis. There also the famous example of Roubini whose famous blog post is with me and I can email it to you if you wish, striking to think that the following lines were written in the fall of 2006: "...the risks of a systemic crisis are serious and grave." "This is a toxic and combustive mix of volatile elements that can lead to a financial explosion and meltdown." etc... There's also the example of Bob Schiller, and an ECB report that I read at the time but no longer have the link to which had a most excellent analysis of the developing situation. Its true that most policymakers and analysts preferred to remain blinkered, such behaviour is fairly typical of bubble era psychology. But there were plenty of people who were willing to see the coming crisis for what it was. Its always impossible to tell the extent of any coming crisis, or even when it will get going, because crises tend to be driven by an extremely complex soup of factors and how they will all interact with each other can be impossible to model precisely. But currently there is oblivion here about the fact that there is an impending crisis, that it could be bigger and worse than the last one, and we have a strong need to at least start thinking about all the ways in which it could arrive on our shores.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ