Christchurch terror attack: Attacker faces 'unprecedented' sentence
'He may be sentenced to imprisonment without parole'
'He may be sentenced to imprisonment without parole.' PHOTO: REUTERS
CHRISTCHURCH:
Mosque gunman Brenton Tarrant faces an 'unprecedented' sentence that bars him from ever applying for release, but could yet dodge terror charges, legal experts told AFP Monday.
The 28-year-old Australian has been charged with one initial count of murder over the mass shootings that killed 50 people in the southern city of Christchurch and faces life in prison.
In New Zealand, being found guilty of murder usually comes with a minimum of 10 years in jail before possible parole.
But legal experts said Tarrant's alleged crimes were so extreme they could warrant the heaviest sentence imposed by a judge in the South Pacific nation since the abolition of the death penalty in 1961.
"He may be sentenced to imprisonment without parole. There is a very significant possibility," criminal lawyer Simon Cullen told AFP, adding that such a sentence would be 'unprecedented'.
"This would seem to be... the type of situation that may well attract consideration of that type of sentence."
The longest-ever murder sentence imposed in New Zealand was in 2001 when a judge sentenced William Bell to life imprisonment with a 30-year minimum term for a triple murder.
University of Auckland criminal procedure expert Bill Hodge said despite Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern labelling the massacre an act of terrorism -- prosecutors may shy away from terror charges.
The Terrorism Suppression Act was only introduced in 2002, after the US 9/11 attacks and is untested in the courts.
"We haven't used our terrorism laws previously and the laws are designed to inhibit or prosecute those involved with groups and financing and publications and the like," Hodge told AFP.
"I don't think there's any reason to use statues that have not been used previously when the Crimes Act -- murder, attempted murder, manslaughter -- are perfectly functional and well-understood."
Hodge said charging Tarrant under terrorism laws risked extending the appeals process.
"It has not been tested in the appeal procedure. Appeals courts point out where the problems might be."
While 50 people were killed in the rampage, police have so far charged Tarrant with one count of murder.
This is not unusual in New Zealand, with the first alleged offence used as a 'holding' charge as police carry out their investigation, Cullen added.
New Zealand PM received gunman's 'manifesto' minutes before attack
Meanwhile, experts said the charges faced by an 18-year-old, whose name was suppressed by a court Monday, for distributing Tarrant's livestream video of the deadly shooting were also breaking new ground.
The teenager was charged with two counts for sharing the livestream of the attack and for making 'objectionable' online publications about one of the mosques.
New Zealand gunman's family 'shattered' by his deeds
The teenager is so far not believed by police to be directly involved in his attacks.
Hodge said the law is commonly used to prosecute people accused of sharing pornography and child pornography.
"I'm not aware of using it for terrorism-related subjects. It's unusual... when it is used for sharing something which is a news event," he said.
Mosque gunman Brenton Tarrant faces an 'unprecedented' sentence that bars him from ever applying for release, but could yet dodge terror charges, legal experts told AFP Monday.
The 28-year-old Australian has been charged with one initial count of murder over the mass shootings that killed 50 people in the southern city of Christchurch and faces life in prison.
In New Zealand, being found guilty of murder usually comes with a minimum of 10 years in jail before possible parole.
But legal experts said Tarrant's alleged crimes were so extreme they could warrant the heaviest sentence imposed by a judge in the South Pacific nation since the abolition of the death penalty in 1961.
"He may be sentenced to imprisonment without parole. There is a very significant possibility," criminal lawyer Simon Cullen told AFP, adding that such a sentence would be 'unprecedented'.
"This would seem to be... the type of situation that may well attract consideration of that type of sentence."
The longest-ever murder sentence imposed in New Zealand was in 2001 when a judge sentenced William Bell to life imprisonment with a 30-year minimum term for a triple murder.
University of Auckland criminal procedure expert Bill Hodge said despite Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern labelling the massacre an act of terrorism -- prosecutors may shy away from terror charges.
The Terrorism Suppression Act was only introduced in 2002, after the US 9/11 attacks and is untested in the courts.
"We haven't used our terrorism laws previously and the laws are designed to inhibit or prosecute those involved with groups and financing and publications and the like," Hodge told AFP.
"I don't think there's any reason to use statues that have not been used previously when the Crimes Act -- murder, attempted murder, manslaughter -- are perfectly functional and well-understood."
Hodge said charging Tarrant under terrorism laws risked extending the appeals process.
"It has not been tested in the appeal procedure. Appeals courts point out where the problems might be."
While 50 people were killed in the rampage, police have so far charged Tarrant with one count of murder.
This is not unusual in New Zealand, with the first alleged offence used as a 'holding' charge as police carry out their investigation, Cullen added.
New Zealand PM received gunman's 'manifesto' minutes before attack
Meanwhile, experts said the charges faced by an 18-year-old, whose name was suppressed by a court Monday, for distributing Tarrant's livestream video of the deadly shooting were also breaking new ground.
The teenager was charged with two counts for sharing the livestream of the attack and for making 'objectionable' online publications about one of the mosques.
New Zealand gunman's family 'shattered' by his deeds
The teenager is so far not believed by police to be directly involved in his attacks.
Hodge said the law is commonly used to prosecute people accused of sharing pornography and child pornography.
"I'm not aware of using it for terrorism-related subjects. It's unusual... when it is used for sharing something which is a news event," he said.