Julia Roberts’ ‘holes getting better with age’ headline typo draws flak online

Newspaper apologises for the error but becomes the butt of jokes online


News Desk December 12, 2018
Newspaper apologises for the error but becomes the butt of jokes online. PHOTO: HINDUSTAN TIMES

A New York-based newspaper has made an unfortunate typo in a story about Julia Roberts which drew a Twitter frenzy over the comical error, The Hindustan Times reported.

The headline reads, “Julia Roberts Finds Life And Her Holes Get Better With Age”. The word ‘holes’ was supposed to be ‘roles’. Several people online spotted the error and tweeted about it.

The newspaper - The Post-Journal - has since apologised for the error, but not before it became the butt of all jokes online. The original story was picked up by the newspaper from the Associated Press.

“A headline on Page D4 in Saturday’s Post-Journal should have read ‘Julia Roberts Finds Life and Her Roles Get Better With Age,’” the paper wrote in its apology, published in a later edition.

Golden Globes 2019: And the nominees are...

“This is why she’s a movie star. My holes have only gotten worse with age,” wrote actor Busy Phillipps on Twitter.

“I like to think all of our holes are getting better with age. Also, copyediting is important,” wrote Eric Spitznagel of the New York Times Magazine.

Julia Roberts’ roles are, in fact, getting better with age. She won critical acclaim for her performance in Amazon’s psychological thriller, Homecoming, which was recently nominated at the Golden Globes. The actor also starred in the drama, Ben is Back.

"With age comes more complexity of possible parts," Roberts said in a recent interview.

"You know, I'm happy and I have fun at home, so it would take a lot for someone to say: 'Look, you can play this part where you're happy and have fun.' Well, I just do that at home!"

The article originally appeared in Mail Online

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ