Life in the twilight zone

Today, every inhabitant of this blighted republic has his/her own idea on how the military should defend itself.


Anwer Mooraj May 29, 2011

Pakistan is passing through what is probably the worst period in its 64-year history. In fact, things have never been as bad as they are today. Though the brew has been simmering on the flame of discontent for quite some time, it was the Abbottabad assault, followed by the daring attacks on the PAF base and on the naval establishment, that was the last straw. While it triggered off deep resentment, the usual dreary predictable collage of cliches and the inevitable conspiracy theories, it also exposed the vulnerability of the Pakistan military — an institution that has always been sacrosanct and seen as the only organisation in the country that was truly professional, organised and functional. In fact, no Pakistani journalist or citizen ever officially criticised the defenders of the nation who were seen as upright citizens of sterling character.

Today, almost every inhabitant of this blighted republic has his or her own private idea on how the military should defend itself. There have been so many lies, half truths and allusions, so many conspiracy theories, so many conflicting hypotheses and assumptions,  ‘proofs’ and whispered innuendos that one no longer knows just what to believe. Was  the unarmed guy with the flowing beard who was executed in Abbottabad  really Osama bin Laden, or did the al Qaeda chief peg down from natural causes in Tora Bora seven years ago?

We will never know, and frankly most Pakistanis whose relatives have been blown up in suicide bomb blasts don’t really care. But what we do know is that Pakistan has acquired the unique distinction of becoming a pariah of the western democracies. The western press finds it inconceivable that Osama bin Laden could have lived in an eyesore mega-compound in the shadow of multiple military installations in a key garrison town without anyone in the Pakistani security establishment knowing who was living there. An American journalist went so far as to suggest that the compound was custom built for Bin Laden as a gilded cage. What is really interesting, however, is, that in spite of the tension that still exists between Washington and Islamabad, many Pakistanis would still prefer to live in America.

The impression the western media has of Pakistan could not be more uncomplimentary and unflattering than it is today. The stereotype is echoed in that caustic passage from Anatol Lieven’s book; Pakistan: A Hard Country, (Allen Lane 1011). After going through a roll call of infirmities he describes the land of the pure as “divided, disorganised, economically backward, corrupt, violent, often savagely oppressive to the poor and women and home to extremely dangerous forms of extremism and terrorism.”

However, before the ultranationalist Pakistani college lad who has been brought up on a diet of male chauvinism and Perfidious Albion breaks into an apoplectic fit he should read on, especially the part where India also comes in for a bit of a drubbing. Like the time when it’s fanatically ideological government conducted nuclear tests, threatened its neighbour with all-out war and presided over the massacre of 2,000 members of a religious minority. It has also embattled against secessionist insurgencies on its western and eastern borders and now struggles to contain a militant movement in its heartland. The difference is that while Pakistan seems to have lost all control over its international narrative, India, which was long feared to be near collapse, and was once described by Galbraith as practicing ‘functional anarchy’, has revamped its old western image through what an American writer referred to as the most “successful national re-branding” and  ‘clever PR campaign.’

The US is still anxious to maintain a working relationship with Pakistan. But this time Prime Minister Gilani appears considerably more buoyant and there appears to be a new spring in his step. Could it be because China has officially put the US on notice that any attack by Washington on Pakistan will be interpreted as an act of aggression against Beijing? It is now blatantly obvious that China is Pakistan’s only real friend.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 30th, 2011.

COMMENTS (17)

Malik | 12 years ago | Reply @ashwin: do you think 1.2 billion population is your strength??? world is much worried about you than Pakistan, because if your people who live now under immense poverty and starvation demand lifestyle even 10% of that a typical western enjoys, where world will go. and by the way do you know about sustainable development and how it is possible with 1.2 billion people??? BBC reports that only India has more poor than whole Africa and what about your poverty line which is only 450 Rs. per person per month, three time less than WB global poverty line. if you say your GDP is 2 trillion dollar (with 1.2 Billion population), look here: Japan GDP 4 trillion $ with only 140 million people US GDP 16 trillion $ with only 300 million people and "India does not pursue Terror as State policy", then how more than 90 thousand people in Kashmir has been killed and many Sikhs and others. and who terrorize comparatively small neighbors like Srilanke, Nepal, and Pakistan. You talk about your engineers and Ph.D. but not talked about 800 million people (5 times of total population of Pakistan) who dont even have access to electricity, should I show you IEA 2009 report, and even million those who spend whole life on streets in big indian cities. If you know economics, then you should also know that putting exchange rate as an indicator of prosperity.is not a good idea. for example Japani Yen may be less than half of indian Rs. but ..................should I say something. and lastly, why you compare India with Pakistan. Is Pakistan a good example for other countries to be followed. This is the reason we Pakistani never compare anything with india because we know that india is much below than even lower threshold for any good indicator. Take care of your home first and let the others live peacefully. Hopefully, next time you will put figures after some homework and will not waste time of ET readers by abusing statistics.
Cautious | 12 years ago | Reply Interesting article until it ended with the nonsensical proposition that China would go to war with the USA over Pakistan. Apparently the author forgot that China wouldn't go to war with India over Pakistan let alone it's largest trading partner (who also has the ability to readily defeat China in a war).
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ