Top judge grills DIG, son-in-law

DIG Dogar had asked Rehman to ensure names of his ex-wife, children remain on ECL


Rana Yasif April 29, 2018
Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar: PHOTO:EXPRESS

LAHORE: Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar on Sunday took strong exception to an attempt made by DIG Ghulam Mahmood Dogar to obtain ‘undue favour’ from his son-in-law Khalid Rehman in a child custody case and summoned Rehman to record his statement.

The Punjab DIG had sought to keep the names of his ex-Canadian wife and children on the Exit Control List (ECL).

The CJP was hearing a case filed by the DIG’s ex-wife Mirjam Aberras Lahdeaho at the Supreme Court’s Lahore Registry.

As the CJP had summoned his own son-in-law, he appeared before the court and contended that DIG Dogar had asked him for a favour regarding keeping his children’s names on the ECL.

The reply irked the CJP.

CJP wants Pakistan Railways audit within six weeks


“How did you approach my family to obtain the favour?” CJP Nisar inquired.

The CJP asked the DIG to explain as to who had advised him to do that. “Who asked you to obtain favour from my family?” the CJP further inquired.  “How dare you think about it?”

After grilling the DIG, the CJP turned towards his son-in-law. “You are the son at home, but here you are before the chief justice,” he said.

Later, Rehman apologised in the courtroom.

He said the DIG Dogar had asked him for a favour. “He had asked me that the names of his Canadian wife and children should remain on the ECL,” Rehman said.

“I am doing Jihad here, but being asked for a favour,” the CJP remarked.

Rehman had appeared before the court with protocol. The protocol officer remained with him and was taken through the judges’ gate.

On Saturday, Finnish origin Canadian woman Lahdeaho had appeared before the CJP along with a complaint against her former husband. She had said that her name and the names of her children were on the ECL due to which she could not travel abroad.

She had requested the court to order the authorities to remove their names from the ECL. The court had summoned the DIG to explain as to why and how the names of the woman and the children were put on the ECL.

Complainant Mirjam had been fighting a legal battle for the custody of the children, including Qasim Dogar, 17, and Jaffer Dogar, 13.

She said she had embraced Islam before marrying the respondent on March 6, 1997 in Lahore and after the marriage, they along with their three children, stayed in Pakistan for over 12 years before moving to Canada as permanent residents in 2009. Zahra Dogar, 19, is their third child.

However, the respondent used to visit his family in Canada frequently instead of staying there permanently due to his job in Pakistan.

COMMENTS (4)

Uzair | 5 years ago | Reply Seems publicity stunt. For me action speak louder than words. If he really don't listen to sifarash why didn't he rejected and written order against the petitioner and khawaja case at once on this ground rather making louder statements just to come in headlines??
A. Nasir | 6 years ago | Reply What was the need to see them in chambers if the respected CJP really wanted to set an example.....really time will tell his credibility!
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ