Three women among five civilians injured in Indian firing along LoC

ISPR says Pakistan Army responded effectively and targeted the Indian post


News Desk April 11, 2018
ISPR says Pakistan Army responded effectively and targeted the Indian post. PHOTO: FILE

At least five civilians including three women were injured when the Indian security forces resorted to unprovoked firing along the Line of Control (LoC) on Wednesday.

“Indian Army initiated unprovoked fire along LoC in Khuiratta Sector targeting innocent civilians. Five citizens including three women got injured,” said a statement issued by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR).

Pakistan Army responded effectively and targeted the Indian post that initiated the firing, it added.

Indian forces kill at least six civilians as protests continue in held Kashmir

The incident took place the same day when the Indian occupying forces martyred at least six civilians in the held Kashmir.

Hundreds of civilians marched on a village in Kulgam district, chanting anti-India slogans and throwing stones at government forces who responded with live rounds, pellets and tear gas.

The violence comes shortly after 20 Kashmiris were martyred in a single day earlier this month.

Pakistan summons Indian deputy HC after woman martyred in LoC firing

In 2018, the Indian forces have carried out more than 900 ceasefire violations along the LoC and the Working Boundary, resulting in the martyrdom of at least 21 innocent civilians, while injuring 90 others.

On Saturday, the Indian deputy high commissioner was summoned by Pakistan’s Foreign Office to condemn a recent ceasefire violation in Nikial sector, resulting in the martyrdom of a woman and injuries to three others.

COMMENTS (2)

Bunny Rabbit | 6 years ago | Reply is it my imagination of Pak blames everything thats happening inKashmir on India ?
Pakistani | 6 years ago | Reply Another Indian soldier was killed in this exchange
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ