Mode of payment to Nawaz from Capital FZE not investigated, says JIT head

Former premier's son was not probed regarding mode of payment during JIT appearance


Rizwan Shehzad April 10, 2018
JIT Head Wajid Zia. PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD: Head of the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) Wajid Zia, during his cross-examination by the defence counsel on Tuesday, informed the court that the team did not investigate the mode of payment to former premier Nawaz Sharif from Capital FZE.

The statement by the JIT head was made in an accountability court, which resumed the hearing of the Avenfield reference against the Sharif family.

On the ninth day of the cross-examination, the focus shifted to the payment certificate obtained by the JIT from Jebal Ali Free Zone Authority (JAFZA). "The payment certificate is certified by JAFZA and it clearly established a payment," Zia said in court.

Avenfield reference: Volume 10 remains sealed, Zia produces MLAs in court

Haris then questioned the JIT's process of obtaining the relevant documents to Capital FZE. "In volume six of the report, the payment certificate attached contains the term 'OTC', what does it stand for," Haris questioned Zia. "I can't say for sure," Zia replied.

At this, Haris questioned whether the JIT made efforts to investigate what OTC stands for, to which Zia replied in the negative and based his argument on the certificate itself and not its contents.

Haris further questioned Zia on another term mentioned in the certificate, 'WPS', asking Zia if he knew what it meant, to which the JIT head again replied in the negative. Haris then said 'WPS' can stand for Wage Protection System.

The WPS system was introduced in 2009, Haris commented. "I don't know when it was introduced, but when the JIT went to obtain the documents, it was in place," Zia replied. At this, Haris replied that the WPS payment system can only be made through banks, to which Zia said, "As per my knowledge, the certificate was to be produced in front of relevant authorities, and that's what I have done."

Upon further probe, the investigation team head revealed that it did not come to the notice of the team that under the WPS, an OTC payment is not permissible. "JIT did not investigate how WPS workes in Dubai, the banking channel can be the only mode of payment," Zia said.

Zia also replied in the negative when asked if the payment certificate mentioned Nawaz's name.

Zia says Panamagate JIT only had to collect records

The JIT head admitted that the team prepared no recovery or memo of possession when they went to Dubai to obtain the documents. The JIT also never confronted Hassan Nawaz regarding the documents pertaining to Capital FZE when he appeared before the team, Zia added and further revealed that the JIT did not approach the company directors or the secretaries of Capital FZE when in Dubai.

Zia also admitted that no notice was sent to Nawaz or Hassan relating to the documents obtained.

The cases

A five-member bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan disqualified the then prime minister Nawaz Sharif on July 28, 2017.

Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan, who headed the apex court’s implementation bench, had announced the bench had deemed Nawaz unfit for holding office.

The court also ordered an accountability court to open references against Nawaz and his family, and other respondents.

The trial against the Sharif family commenced on September 14, 2017.
The corruption references filed against the Sharif family pertain to Al-Azizia Steel Mills and Hills Metal Establishment, offshore companies including Flagship Investment Ltd and London’s Avenfield properties.

Nawaz and his sons, Hassan and Hussain, are accused in all three references, whereas daughter Maryam Nawaz and son-in-law MNA Capt (retd) Safdar are accused in the Avenfield reference.

Sons of the deposed premier, living abroad, have been absconding since the proceedings were initiated and were declared proclaimed offenders by the court.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ