"In case of any violation, an appropriate action shall be taken against the delinquent transporters strictly in accordance with the law," warned a two-judge bench, headed by Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi.
The bench was hearing a petition filed by a lawyer against hike in the fares of intercity public transport and seeking enforcement of the rate notified by the Sindh government. The matter was heard on Tuesday.
Public transport remains off road in the city
The petitioner, Wajid Ali Khaskheli, had named the provincial chief secretary, transport secretary and the private-public transport companies as respondents in the matter.
The petitioner expressed his grievance against the transport mafia, alleging they were charging exorbitant fares from passengers travelling on intercity routes over the province.
According to him, an official notification issued on March 1, 2016 by the provincial transport and mass transit department in relation to the fixation of fare was not being implemented by the official respondents.
He pointed out that road traffic incidents were repeatedly taking place on intercity routes because most of the public transport vehicles plying across the province were outdated or unfit to be on the road.
He pleaded to the court to direct the chief secretary and transport secretary implement the government-notified fares. He also sought direction for them to take action against the transporters if they charged exorbitant fares from passengers.
Shiny and new: Multi-modal intercity bus terminals to replace existing structures
After hearing the initial arguments, the bench issued pre-admission notices to the provincial transport secretary, the advocate-general and others to file their comments by February 15.
The judges directed the respondents to ensure that all public vehicles charge the fare as per rates fixed by the government.
They also warned that action will be taken against delinquent transporters strictly in accordance with the law.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ