Kalma Chowk flyover: Environmental groups to continue campaign

Say they will raise objections to project at public hearing on May 6.

Sonia Malik May 04, 2011


Environmental groups say they will continue to campaign against the Kalma Chowk flyover and underpass despite a failed legal challenge, as the project will harm the environment and is not in the public interest in any case.

The Lahore Conservation Society and other environmental NGOs have already challenged the project in the Lahore High Court, though their plea was dismissed as the flyover and underpass were deemed in the public interest to ease traffic congestion on Ferozepur Road.

The court did not uphold the law when it allowed construction without considering the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report, says Erum Aftab of the Lahore Conservation Society. The EIA report, conducted by the National Engineering Services of Pakistan (NESPAK), was only presented in court after construction began.

According to the Pakistan Environment Protection Act, any project costing over Rs50 million must include an EIA report. The Environmental Protection Department (EPD) then must issue a no objection certificate (NOC) before construction can begin. The EPD says it cannot issue one until there is a public hearing where stakeholders can raise concerns about the EIA report. That hearing is due on May 6.

Aftab and Rafay Alam, an environmental activist and lawyer representing the environmental groups in court, said they would raise several questions at the May 6 hearing. They said the project was a poor use of scarce resources that would be better spent on developing a public transport system.

Alam said 40 per cent of commuters are pedestrians and 22 per cent use public buses. Neither of these groups, which together form a majority of commuters, will benefit from the flyover, he said, citing the preliminary findings of the Lahore Urban Transport Master Plan, a study being conducted by the Japanese International Cooperation Agency which is to be released in less than nine months.

“It would have been wiser of the government to wait for the outcome of the study before going ahead with such construction,” Aftab says.

Alam said the government should consider a rapid mass rail transit system instead. In 2007, the Punjab government commissioned a report on the feasibility of such a project in Lahore. The report said that an overground-underground rail network would be the ideal transport solution for the city, he said.

“The consultants indicated that one of the lines of this proposed network would run along Ferozepur Road and another from Garden Town through Gulberg. These two lines were to intersect under Kalma Chowk where the feasibility proposed two underground stations. The construction of the overpass means that the proposed crossing at Kalma Chowk will no longer be suitable for mass transit,” he said.

Alam also said there was a conflict of interests since the project’s design engineers, Nespak, were also its EIA consultants. “They are charging a consultancy fee of 1.84 per cent of the project cost. Do you expect Nespak to give an objective assessment or alternative to construction of a flyover and an underpass?”

He said Nespak also provided both the design and the EIA report for the underpasses on The Canal from The Mall intersection to the Faisal Town intersection. He said there was no law explicitly requiring separate parties to do the design and the EIA report, but he would raise this issue at the May 6 hearing.

Sabir Khan, project director at the Communication and Works Department, said 35 of the 177 trees planted on Ferozepur Road around Model Town and the Canal would be cut for the flyover, but a quarter would be replanted by the Pakistan Horticulture Authority. He said Rs15 million of the Rs2.5 billion budget for construction of the underpass and flyover had been set aside for tree plantation following the construction phase.

The EIA report for the project states that 460 trees will be planted in four years time at an estimated cost of Rs268,640. Khan said no trees had been chopped and they would not until the final stage.

Aftab said some trees along Ferozepur Road had already been cut down in March. She had pictures showing trees being chopped down at night.

Khan said that sections of the flyover were being assembled at a site some 13km off Kasur Road and would be brought to Kalma Chowk when ready. This would reduce the dust and noise pollution at the chowk.

“No such measures were taken during the construction of any other underpass or flyover in the city,” Khan said.

EPD spokesman Naseemur Rahman said water sprinklers would be installed to settle dust during peak construction time.

He said construction work was being carried out during the day; people who live or work near Kalma Chowk are already used to the traffic noise, he said, and would find it bearable during the day.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 4th, 2011.


khan | 9 years ago | Reply covered ways for our politician and other groups to earn money, today if the environmental athourities are offered the handsome amount, they will simply close their eyes, they are shouting not for our interests but their own.
A Suhail | 9 years ago | Reply So I have a question for all my friends who are crying about congestion at Kalma Chowk. Do you guys think the fly over will result in a congestion free kalma chowk for the next 10 years. What if, and I am sure of it, the increase in number of cars in the next 10 years create more congestion at Kalma chowk, then what will we do? Build another fly over on top of the current fly over? When the civilized world is doing away with the concept of flyovers and under passes, we are building more of it. Look at the traffic in Los Angeles, the city of freeways, has the most congested roads in all over US. The county government over the years have built 605, 710, 405, 210, I-5 and many more freeways but the traffic keeps on getting worse there. NOw they regret not investing in a city wide metro system( there is a subway but it does not go every where) as the cost to build one is astronomical. Lets not make the same mistakes as the city of LA's fathers did. Even Japanese can not get rid of traffic congestion supposedly the most advanced state in the world. We do not want Lahore to get to a point like Shanghai, where local government only allows cars with certain number to come on roads each day. Lets think for the future and stop this madness and waste of resources over one flyover so that a few spoiled kids can get to their homes a bit earlier. Why not use this money to build a much needed school or hospital in south Punjab.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ