Pakistan rights group warns of shrinking press freedom in Balochistan

HRCP calls on all sides to desist from activities that directly threaten journalists, newspaper employees and hawkers

Afp November 21, 2017
PHOTO: Reuters/File

QUETTA: A leading rights group warned on Tuesday of shrinking press freedom in Pakistan's troubled Balochistan province, a month after a series of media outlets restricted activities following threats from militants.

Journalists in Balochistan said they were approached earlier this year by intelligence agencies who asked them to stop publishing statements by Baloch separatist groups.

After they did so, the insurgents warned newspapers and private television channels of dire consequences for halting coverage of their activities.

The situation remains tense in the province where newspaper distribution is confined to 18 out of 34 districts, largely areas where the militants have little to no presence.

Pakistan to move Interpol for arrest of Hyrbyair, Brahumdagh

"In an already coercive environment where there are numerous restraints and threats to freedom of expression, the current suspension of newspapers only further exacerbates the situation," Mehdi Hassan, the chairman of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP), said in a statement.

"In the prevailing circumstances HRCP calls on all sides to immediately desist from any activities that directly threaten journalists, newspaper employees and hawkers and their livelihoods."

Pakistan is routinely ranked among the world's most unsafe countries for reporters, and Amnesty International has singled out Balochistan for the deadly pressure journalists face there.

Rights groups say activists and journalists often find themselves caught between the security establishment and militant groups.

According to Reporters Without Borders (RSF), around 40 journalists have been murdered in the province since the start of the current conflict in 2006.


Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read