India shifting focus of nuclear strategy from Pakistan to China: study

American experts believe New Delhi is constantly modernising its nuclear arsenal to counter Chinese influence


News Desk July 13, 2017
American experts believe New Delhi is constantly modernising its nuclear arsenal to confront Chinese influence. PHOTO: AFP / FILE

India is constantly modernising its nuclear arsenal in what appears to be a shift of its nuclear strategy, traditionally focused on Pakistan, to China, a study has revealed.

“India continues to modernise its nuclear arsenal, with at least four new weapon systems now under development to complement or replace existing nuclear-capable aircraft, land-based delivery systems, and sea-based systems,” said two top American nuclear experts in the July-August issue of digital journal After Midnight.

“India is estimated to have produced enough plutonium for 150–200 nuclear warheads but has likely produced only 120–130,” wrote Hans M Kristensen and Robert S Norris in the article Indian nuclear forces 2017.

A potential shift in India’s nuclear strategy

The study suggests that the nuclear armed nation currently operates seven nuclear-capable systems, including two aircraft, four land-based ballistic missiles and one sea-based ballistic missile with at least four more systems in the development phase. “The development programme is in a dynamic phase, with long-range land- and sea-based missiles emerging for possible deployment within the next decade. “

The report further reveals that India is estimated to have produced approximately 600 kilogrammes of weapon-grade plutonium, however, not all the material has been converted into nuclear warheads, sufficient for 150–200 nuclear warheads. “It will need more warheads to arm the new missiles it is currently developing.”

‘Decoupling’ nuclear strategy

While India has traditionally been focused on deterring Pakistan, its nuclear modernisation indicates that it is putting increased emphasis on its future strategic relationship with China, claimed the nuclear experts. “That adjustment will result in significantly new capabilities being deployed over the next decade that may influence how India views nuclear weapons’ role against Pakistan.”

India and the politics of nonproliferation

Quoting a scholar, the report said: “We may be witnessing what I call a ‘decoupling’ of Indian nuclear strategy between China and Pakistan. The force requirements India needs in order to credibly threaten assured retaliation against China may allow it to pursue more aggressive strategies – such as escalation dominance or a ‘splendid first strike’ – against Pakistan.”

Explaining the possibilities of New Delhi’s use of nuclear weapons against Islamabad, the report referred to the 2016 remarks of then-Indian defence minister Manohar Parrikar in which he questioned his country’s no-first-use nuclear policy.

COMMENTS (10)

Faisal | 7 years ago | Reply @ramdar: By going nuclear, India forced Pakistan to go nuclear. Hope that solved India's problem of having one neighbour with nukes (China) - now it has 2 neigbhours with nukes and guess what both these neighbours think of India???
Faisal | 7 years ago | Reply @Prasad: Numerous genetic studies done by neutral countries shows a clear genetic difference between most of the people of today's Pakistan and the majority of today's Indians - the haplogroups in the DNA profile are statistically different and it makes sense. Pakistan is a conglomeration of Aryans, Arabs, Afghans, Iranians (e.g. Balochis have far more common ancestry with Balochis of Iran and Arabia than with Indians), Central Asians, etc Muslims in the South Asia first of all arrived from Arabia, then Central Asia, etc. and they always settled as conquerors who didn't inter-marry much with the incumbent population of South Asia. Their numbers swelled as well over the centuries when they made South Asia their home. It was only much later in Mughal times that inter-marrying with South Asians really took off but by then there was much variation in the populations of North West Sub-continent (Today;s Pakistan), Afghanistan and the dominant Hindu population of India. Also, Muslims, Christians and Jews believe that Adam was the first human being.So pls. don't stop at 1,400 years in history.....for Muslims the start of humanity was pure with Adam, a monotheist, and Hindus came into being much much much later after Adam. So you can't win us over with cultural propoganda!
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ